Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9404
Title: Post harvest wound infection and patient's perception: comparative study between radial artery and saphenous vein harvest sites.
Austin Authors: Hata, Mitsumasa;Raman, Jai S ;Matalanis, George ;Rosalion, Alexander;Storer, Meg ;Hare, David L ;Buxton, Brian F 
Affiliation: Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre, University of Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2002
Publication information: Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery : Official Journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia; 8(2): 97-101
Abstract: Despite renewed clinical interest in radial artery grafts (RA) for coronary artery bypass grafting, there is a paucity of controlled prospective data on its efficacy. We report on the rate of harvest related complications from a randomized radial artery study.Two hundred eighty nine patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 received RA grafts (n=154 patients) and Group 2 (n=135 patients) received saphenous vein grafts (SVG). Postoperative wound problems were assessed using a questionnaire. Postoperative harvest site infections were also carefully documented.In group 1, 6 of 154 (3.9%) patients had harvest site wound infections. Five of them improved by antibiotic therapy alone. In group 2, 24 of 135 (17.8%) patients had harvest site wound infections (p=0.001 vs. group 1). Fifteen of these patients needed redressing due to discharge from the wound. One hundred forty-nine patients (96.7%) in group 1 answered that their hand function was normal on the questionnaire. Concerns and discomfort about the arm scars in the group 1 were of a similar value of 5.2% (8/154), respectively. In group 2, the incidence of those about the leg were 7.4% (10/135) and 11.9% (16/135), respectively. Although there was no significant difference in concerns about the scar, discomfort was significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (p=0.0139).RA harvest is associated with fewer wound infections and scar discomfort than SVG harvest. Radial artery harvest is almost acceptable in terms of a patient's perception. However, there are still patients who have some symptoms in the forearm after RA harvest. Long-term follow-up is necessary for patient's hand function.
Gov't Doc #: 12027796
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9404
ORCID: 0000-0001-9554-6556
Journal: Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia
PubMed URL: 12027796
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Aged
Australia.epidemiology
Body Mass Index
Coronary Artery Bypass
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Forearm.blood supply.surgery
Humans
Leg.blood supply.surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Prevalence
Radial Artery.transplantation
Saphenous Vein.transplantation
Surgical Wound Infection.epidemiology.etiology
Treatment Outcome
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.