Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26168
Title: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of intravenous chlorpromazine versus intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute migraine in adults presenting to the emergency department.
Austin Authors: Hodgson, Sarah E;Harding, Andrew M ;Bourke, Elyssia M;Taylor, David McD ;Greene, Shaun L 
Affiliation: Pharmacy
Emergency
Victorian Poisons Information Centre
Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2021
Date: 2021
Publication information: Headache 2021; 61(4): 603-611
Abstract: To compare the efficacy of intravenous chlorpromazine versus intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute migraine in adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). Migraine is a common, incapacitating neurological condition. Although chlorpromazine and prochlorperazine are known to be safe, efficacious treatments for migraine, they have never been directly compared. We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Adults aged 18-65 years, who presented with migraine, were eligible for recruitment. Sixty-six patients were randomized to either chlorpromazine 12.5 mg or prochlorperazine 12.5 mg, both infused in 500 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% over 30 min. Headache severity score, nausea severity score, and the presence of photophobia and phonophobia were assessed at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min. Adverse effects and the need for rescue therapy were recorded. The primary outcome was a reduction in headache severity score from baseline at 60 min post-commencement of the study medicine infusion. Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. There was a median reduction in headache severity score at 60 min of 3.0 (interquartile range 1.0-4.0) in the chlorpromazine arm versus 2.0 (1.0-4.0) in the prochlorperazine arm (median difference -0.5 (95% confidence interval, -1.9 to 0.9)). We saw no evidence of a difference in secondary outcomes at 30, 60, or 120 min. Side effects were reported in 16/32 (50%) patients in the chlorpromazine group versus 7/33 (21%) in the prochlorperazine group (p = 0.020). Rescue therapy was required in 12/33 (36%) patients in the chlorpromazine group versus 7/32 (22%) in the prochlorperazine group (p = 0.277). Both chlorpromazine and prochlorperazine are efficacious treatments for acute migraine in adult patients presenting to the ED. This trial found no evidence of superiority of either agent over the other. Caution should be used when prescribing these medicines in the borderline hypotensive patient; in that circumstance, prochlorperazine should be preferentially used.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26168
DOI: 10.1111/head.14091
ORCID: 0000-0003-4649-1813
0000-0003-3992-7316
0000-0001-5617-0955
0000-0002-8986-9997
0000-0002-7423-2467
Journal: Headache
PubMed URL: 33797074
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: chlorpromazine
emergency medicine
migraine
prochlorperazine
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

246
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.