Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26168
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Sarah E-
dc.contributor.authorHarding, Andrew M-
dc.contributor.authorBourke, Elyssia M-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, David McD-
dc.contributor.authorGreene, Shaun L-
dc.date2021-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-08T02:43:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-08T02:43:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationHeadache 2021; 61(4): 603-611en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26168-
dc.description.abstractTo compare the efficacy of intravenous chlorpromazine versus intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute migraine in adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). Migraine is a common, incapacitating neurological condition. Although chlorpromazine and prochlorperazine are known to be safe, efficacious treatments for migraine, they have never been directly compared. We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Adults aged 18-65 years, who presented with migraine, were eligible for recruitment. Sixty-six patients were randomized to either chlorpromazine 12.5 mg or prochlorperazine 12.5 mg, both infused in 500 ml of sodium chloride 0.9% over 30 min. Headache severity score, nausea severity score, and the presence of photophobia and phonophobia were assessed at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min. Adverse effects and the need for rescue therapy were recorded. The primary outcome was a reduction in headache severity score from baseline at 60 min post-commencement of the study medicine infusion. Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. There was a median reduction in headache severity score at 60 min of 3.0 (interquartile range 1.0-4.0) in the chlorpromazine arm versus 2.0 (1.0-4.0) in the prochlorperazine arm (median difference -0.5 (95% confidence interval, -1.9 to 0.9)). We saw no evidence of a difference in secondary outcomes at 30, 60, or 120 min. Side effects were reported in 16/32 (50%) patients in the chlorpromazine group versus 7/33 (21%) in the prochlorperazine group (p = 0.020). Rescue therapy was required in 12/33 (36%) patients in the chlorpromazine group versus 7/32 (22%) in the prochlorperazine group (p = 0.277). Both chlorpromazine and prochlorperazine are efficacious treatments for acute migraine in adult patients presenting to the ED. This trial found no evidence of superiority of either agent over the other. Caution should be used when prescribing these medicines in the borderline hypotensive patient; in that circumstance, prochlorperazine should be preferentially used.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectchlorpromazineen
dc.subjectemergency medicineen
dc.subjectmigraineen
dc.subjectprochlorperazineen
dc.titleA prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of intravenous chlorpromazine versus intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute migraine in adults presenting to the emergency department.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleHeadacheen
dc.identifier.affiliationPharmacyen
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergencyen
dc.identifier.affiliationVictorian Poisons Information Centreen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine and Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/head.14091en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4649-1813en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3992-7316en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5617-0955en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8986-9997en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7423-2467en
dc.identifier.pubmedid33797074-
local.name.researcherGreene, Shaun L
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
crisitem.author.deptPharmacy-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
crisitem.author.deptToxicology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

240
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.