Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35497
Title: A Position Modification Device for the Prevention of Supine Sleep During Pregnancy: A Randomised Crossover Trial.
Austin Authors: Wilson, Danielle L ;Whenn, Carley;Barnes, Maree ;Walker, Susan P;Howard, Mark E 
Affiliation: Institute for Breathing and Sleep
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.;Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Issue Date: 16-Sep-2024
Date: 2024
Publication information: BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2024-09-16
Abstract: To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of a pillow-like position modification device to reduce supine sleep during late pregnancy, and to determine the impacts on the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and foetal well-being. Randomised cross-over study. Individuals in the third trimester of pregnancy receiving antenatal care at a tertiary maternity hospital in Australia. Participants used their own pillow for a control week and an intervention pillow for a week overnight, in randomised order. Sleep position and total sleep time for each night of both weeks were objectively monitored, with a sleep study and foetal heart rate monitoring performed on the last night of each week. Primary outcome = percentage of sleep time in the supine position; secondary outcomes = apnoea-hypopnoea index, foetal heart rate decelerations and birthweight centile. Forty-one individuals were randomised with data collected on 35 participants over 469 nights. There was no difference in percentage of total sleep time in the supine position overnight between the control or intervention pillow week (13.0% [6.1, 25.5] vs. 16.0% [5.6, 27.2], p = 0.81 with a mean difference of 2.5% [95% CI] = -0.7, 5.6, p = 0.12), and no difference in the severity of SDB or foetal heart rate decelerations across weeks. However, increased supine sleep was significantly related to a higher apnoea-hypopnoea index (rs = 0.37, p = 0.003), lower birthweight (rs = -0.45, p = 0.007) and lower birthweight centile (rs = -0.45, p = 0.006). The proportion of supine sleep each night of the week varied widely both within and across participants, despite awareness of side-sleeping recommendations. We found no evidence to suggest that the adoption of a pillow designed to discourage supine sleep was effective in late pregnancy, with women spending an average of 1 h per night supine. Alternative devices should be investigated, incorporating lessons learnt from this study to inform trials of supine sleep minimisation in pregnancy. Clinical Trial: (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12620000371998.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35497
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17952
ORCID: 0000-0001-6754-7359
Journal: BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
PubMed URL: 39279669
ISSN: 1471-0528
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: accuracy of self‐report
birthweight
foetal heart rate
night‐to‐night variability
pillow
pregnant
side sleeping
sleep apnoea
sleep‐disordered breathing
stillbirth
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.