Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29664
Title: Altering the rehabilitation environment to improve stroke survivor activity: A Phase II trial.
Austin Authors: Janssen, Heidi;Ada, Louise;Middleton, Sandy;Pollack, Michael;Nilsson, Michael;Churilov, Leonid ;Blennerhassett, Jannette M ;Faux, Steven;New, Peter;McCluskey, Annie;Spratt, Neil J;Bernhardt, Julie
Affiliation: Physiotherapy
Faculty of Health Sciences Department, Nursing Research Institute, Australia..
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia..
Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine and Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia..
Department of Medicine & Rehabilitation and Aged Services Program, 2538Monash Health, Australia..
Monash Medical School & Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia..
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia..
5260Hunter New England Local Health District, Australia..
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia..
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Australia..
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Issue Date: Mar-2022
Date: 2021
Publication information: International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society 2022; 17(3): 299-307
Abstract: Environmental enrichment involves organization of the environment and provision of equipment to facilitate engagement in physical, cognitive, and social activities. In animals with stroke, it promotes brain plasticity and recovery. To assess the feasibility and safety of a patient-driven model of environmental enrichment incorporating access to communal and individual environmental enrichment. A nonrandomized cluster trial with blinded measurement involving people with stroke (n = 193) in four rehabilitation units was carried out. Feasibility was operationalized as activity 10 days after admission to rehabilitation and availability of environmental enrichment. Safety was measured as falls and serious adverse events. Benefit was measured as clinical outcomes at three months, by an assessor blinded to group. The experimental group (n = 91) spent 7% (95% CI -14 to 0) less time inactive, 9% (95% CI 0-19) more time physically, and 6% (95% CI 2-10) more time socially active than the control group (n = 102). Communal environmental enrichment was available 100% of the time, but individual environmental enrichment was rarely within reach (24%) or sight (39%). There were no between-group differences in serious adverse events or falls at discharge or three months or in clinical outcomes at three months. This patient-driven model of environmental enrichment was feasible and safe. However, the very modest increase in activity by people with stroke, and the lack of benefit in clinical outcomes three months after stroke do not provide justification for an efficacy trial.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29664
DOI: 10.1177/17474930211006999
ORCID: 0000-0002-9883-047X
0000-0002-9807-6606
0000-0002-2787-8484
Journal: International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society
PubMed URL: 33739202
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33739202/
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Stroke
activity
clinical trial
environmental enrichment
recovery
rehabilitation
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.