Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29664
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Heidi-
dc.contributor.authorAda, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Sandy-
dc.contributor.authorPollack, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorChurilov, Leonid-
dc.contributor.authorBlennerhassett, Jannette M-
dc.contributor.authorFaux, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorNew, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorMcCluskey, Annie-
dc.contributor.authorSpratt, Neil J-
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Julie-
dc.date2021-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-31T22:50:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-31T22:50:16Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society 2022; 17(3): 299-307en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29664-
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental enrichment involves organization of the environment and provision of equipment to facilitate engagement in physical, cognitive, and social activities. In animals with stroke, it promotes brain plasticity and recovery. To assess the feasibility and safety of a patient-driven model of environmental enrichment incorporating access to communal and individual environmental enrichment. A nonrandomized cluster trial with blinded measurement involving people with stroke (n = 193) in four rehabilitation units was carried out. Feasibility was operationalized as activity 10 days after admission to rehabilitation and availability of environmental enrichment. Safety was measured as falls and serious adverse events. Benefit was measured as clinical outcomes at three months, by an assessor blinded to group. The experimental group (n = 91) spent 7% (95% CI -14 to 0) less time inactive, 9% (95% CI 0-19) more time physically, and 6% (95% CI 2-10) more time socially active than the control group (n = 102). Communal environmental enrichment was available 100% of the time, but individual environmental enrichment was rarely within reach (24%) or sight (39%). There were no between-group differences in serious adverse events or falls at discharge or three months or in clinical outcomes at three months. This patient-driven model of environmental enrichment was feasible and safe. However, the very modest increase in activity by people with stroke, and the lack of benefit in clinical outcomes three months after stroke do not provide justification for an efficacy trial.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjectactivityen
dc.subjectclinical trialen
dc.subjectenvironmental enrichmenten
dc.subjectrecoveryen
dc.subjectrehabilitationen
dc.titleAltering the rehabilitation environment to improve stroke survivor activity: A Phase II trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Societyen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Health Sciences Department, Nursing Research Institute, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartments of Rehabilitation Medicine and Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine & Rehabilitation and Aged Services Program, 2538Monash Health, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash Medical School & Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliation5260Hunter New England Local Health District, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationHunter Medical Research Institute, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Healthen
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33739202/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/17474930211006999en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9883-047Xen
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9807-6606en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2787-8484en
dc.identifier.pubmedid33739202
local.name.researcherBlennerhassett, Jannette M
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.