Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27109
Title: Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation.
Austin Authors: Naughton, Phoebe E;Sheers, Nicole ;Berlowitz, David J ;Howard, Mark E ;McKim, Douglas A;Katz, Sherri L
Affiliation: Respiratory and Sleep Medicine
Institute for Breathing and Sleep
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Respiratory Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Respiratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Issue Date: Jul-2021
Publication information: BMJ Open Respiratory Research 2021; 8(1): e000918
Abstract: Lung volume recruitment manoeuvres are often prescribed to maintain respiratory health in neuromuscular disease. Unfortunately, no current system accurately records delivered dose. This study determined the performance characteristics of a novel, objective, manual lung volume recruitment bag counter ('the counter') with bench and healthy volunteer testing, as well as in individuals with neuromuscular disease. We undertook (1) bench test determination of activation threshold, (2) bench and healthy volunteer fidelity testing during simulated patient interface leak and different pressure compressions and (3) comparisons with self-report in individuals with neuromuscular disease. The data are reported as summary statistics, compression counts, percentage of recorded versus delivered compressions and concordance (Cohen's kappa (K) and absolute agreement). RESULTS: Minimum counter activation pressure under conditions of zero leak was 1.9±0.4 cm H2O. No difference was observed between the number of repetitions delivered and recorded during high airway pressure condition. Interface leak approximating 25% resulted in underestimation of repetition counts, and once the leak was at 50% or beyond, the counter recorded no activity. Faster sampling frequency collected data with more fidelity. Counter data agreed with diary self-report during community trials (16 participants, 960 participant days, 77% agreement, Cohen's Κ=0.66 and p<0.001). Disagreement typically favoured more diary reported (18%) than counter (5%) sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The performance characteristics of a new lung volume recruitment counter have been established in both laboratory and community settings. Objective usage and dosage data should accelerate new knowledge development and better translation of lung volume recruitment therapy into policy and practice.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27109
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000918
ORCID: 0000-0003-2543-8722
Journal: BMJ Open Respiratory Research
PubMed URL: 34326156
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: assisted ventilation
equipment evaluations
exercise
lung physiology
non invasive ventilation
respiratory muscles
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jul 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.