Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group.
Austin Authors: Bellomo, Rinaldo ;Ronco, Claudio;Kellum, John A;Mehta, Ravindra L;Palevsky, Paul
Institutional Author: Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup
Affiliation: Department of Intensive Care and Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 24-May-2004
Publication information: Critical Care 2004; 8(4): R204-12
Abstract: There is no consensus definition of acute renal failure (ARF) in critically ill patients. More than 30 different definitions have been used in the literature, creating much confusion and making comparisons difficult. Similarly, strong debate exists on the validity and clinical relevance of animal models of ARF; on choices of fluid management and of end-points for trials of new interventions in this field; and on how information technology can be used to assist this process. Accordingly, we sought to review the available evidence, make recommendations and delineate key questions for future studies.We undertook a systematic review of the literature using Medline and PubMed searches. We determined a list of key questions and convened a 2-day consensus conference to develop summary statements via a series of alternating breakout and plenary sessions. In these sessions, we identified supporting evidence and generated recommendations and/or directions for future research.We found sufficient consensus on 47 questions to allow the development of recommendations. Importantly, we were able to develop a consensus definition for ARF. In some cases it was also possible to issue useful consensus recommendations for future investigations. We present a summary of the findings. (Full versions of the six workgroups' findings are available on the internet at limited data, broad areas of consensus exist for the physiological and clinical principles needed to guide the development of consensus recommendations for defining ARF, selection of animal models, methods of monitoring fluid therapy, choice of physiological and clinical end-points for trials, and the possible role of information technology.
DOI: 10.1186/cc2872
Journal: Critical Care
PubMed URL: 15312219
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Acute Kidney Injury.diagnosis.therapy
Critical Illness.classification
Fluid Therapy
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Models, Animal
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Renal Replacement Therapy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
15312219.pdf288.87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Mar 4, 2024


checked on Mar 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.