Austin Health

Title
How registry data are used to inform activities for stroke care quality improvement across 55 countries: A cross-sectional survey of Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) hospitals.
Publication Date
2024-01
Author(s)
Fasugba, Oyebola
Sedani, Rupal
Mikulik, Robert
Dale, Simeon
Vařecha, Miroslav
Coughlan, Kelly
McElduff, Benjamin
McInnes, Elizabeth
Hladíková, Sabina
Cadilhac, Dominique A
Middleton, Sandy
Subject
clinical quality registry
data
quality improvement
stroke
Type of document
Journal Article
OrcId
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
0000-0001-8162-682X
0000-0002-7201-4394
DOI
10.1111/ene.16024
Abstract
The Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) is a world-wide quality improvement data platform that captures performance and quality measures enabling standardized comparisons of hospital care. The aim of this study was to determine if, and how, RES-Q data are used to influence stroke quality improvement; and identify support and educational needs of clinicians in use of RES-Q data to improve stroke care. A cross-sectional self-administered online survey was administered (October 2021-February 2022). Participants were RES-Q hospital local coordinators responsible for stroke data collection. Descriptive statistics are presented. Surveys were sent to 1463 hospitals in 74 countries; responses received from 358 hospitals in 55 countries (response rate 25%). RES-Q data were used 'always' or 'often' to: develop quality improvement initiatives (n=213, 60%); track stroke care quality over time (n=207, 58%); improve local practice (n=191, 53%); and benchmark against evidence-based policies, procedures and/or guidelines to identify practice gaps (n=179, 50%). Formal training in use of RES-Q tools and data were the most frequent support needs identified by respondents (n=165, 46%). Over half 'strongly agreed' or 'agreed' that to support clinical practice change, education is needed on: i) using data to identify evidence-practice gaps (n=259, 72%) and change clinical practice (n=263, 74%), and ii) quality improvement science and methods (n=255, 71%). RES-Q data are used for monitoring stroke care performance. However, to facilitate its optimal use, effective quality improvement methods are needed. Educating staff in quality improvement science may develop competency and improve use of data in practice.
Link
Citation
European Journal of Neurology 2024-01; 31(1)
Jornal Title
European Journal of Neurology
ISSN
1468-1331

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
Euro J of Neurology - 2023 - Fasugba.pdf 896.727 KB application/pdf View document