Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33479
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFasugba, Oyebola-
dc.contributor.authorSedani, Rupal-
dc.contributor.authorMikulik, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorDale, Simeon-
dc.contributor.authorVařecha, Miroslav-
dc.contributor.authorCoughlan, Kelly-
dc.contributor.authorMcElduff, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorMcInnes, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorHladíková, Sabina-
dc.contributor.authorCadilhac, Dominique A-
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Sandy-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T04:43:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T04:43:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Neurology 2024-01; 31(1)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-1331-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33479-
dc.description.abstractThe Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) is a world-wide quality improvement data platform that captures performance and quality measures enabling standardized comparisons of hospital care. The aim of this study was to determine if, and how, RES-Q data are used to influence stroke quality improvement; and identify support and educational needs of clinicians in use of RES-Q data to improve stroke care. A cross-sectional self-administered online survey was administered (October 2021-February 2022). Participants were RES-Q hospital local coordinators responsible for stroke data collection. Descriptive statistics are presented. Surveys were sent to 1463 hospitals in 74 countries; responses received from 358 hospitals in 55 countries (response rate 25%). RES-Q data were used 'always' or 'often' to: develop quality improvement initiatives (n=213, 60%); track stroke care quality over time (n=207, 58%); improve local practice (n=191, 53%); and benchmark against evidence-based policies, procedures and/or guidelines to identify practice gaps (n=179, 50%). Formal training in use of RES-Q tools and data were the most frequent support needs identified by respondents (n=165, 46%). Over half 'strongly agreed' or 'agreed' that to support clinical practice change, education is needed on: i) using data to identify evidence-practice gaps (n=259, 72%) and change clinical practice (n=263, 74%), and ii) quality improvement science and methods (n=255, 71%). RES-Q data are used for monitoring stroke care performance. However, to facilitate its optimal use, effective quality improvement methods are needed. Educating staff in quality improvement science may develop competency and improve use of data in practice.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectclinical quality registryen_US
dc.subjectdataen_US
dc.subjectquality improvementen_US
dc.subjectstrokeen_US
dc.titleHow registry data are used to inform activities for stroke care quality improvement across 55 countries: A cross-sectional survey of Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) hospitals.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Neurologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and Australian Catholic University, Australia.;School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInternational Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInternational Clinical Research Centre, Neurology Department, St. Anne's University Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and Australian Catholic University, Australia.;School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInternational Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Healthen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInternational Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationStroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.;Stroke Theme, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and Australian Catholic University, Australia.;School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ene.16024en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8162-682Xen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7201-4394en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37540834-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Euro J of Neurology - 2023 - Fasugba.pdf875.71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Nov 19, 2024

Download(s)

10
checked on Nov 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.