Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33439
Title: A planning-based feasibility study of MR-Linac treatment for anal cancer radiation therapy.
Austin Authors: Smith, Drew;Knight, Kellie;Sim, Jenny;Lim Joon, Daryl ;Foroudi, Farshad ;Khoo, Vincent
Affiliation: Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre
Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Radiation Oncology
Issue Date: 26-Jul-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Medical Dosimetry: Official Journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 2023-07-26, 48(4)
Abstract: The hybrid magnetic resonance image (MRI) scanner and radiation therapy linear accelerator (MR-Linac) has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes for anal cancer (AC) patients with improved soft tissue visualization and daily plan adaption but has planning and delivery limitations due to the incorporation of MRI. We aimed to identify if Elekta Unity MR-Linac-based radiation therapy is feasible for anal cancer. Ten prospectively enrolled AC patients treated with radical chemoradiotherapy were replanned for MR-Linac treatment using departmental planning criteria. For comparison, and to reduce interobserver variability, volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy (VMAT) plans were also created for each patient by the same single senior radiation therapist. Plans were compared using departmental dosimetric plan criteria, as well as conformity and homogeneity indices, monitor units (MUs) and measured plan delivery (beam-on) time. Results were deemed clinically acceptable. Target and organ at risk (OAR) doses were comparable between MR-Linac plans and VMAT plans, although PTV45Gy D98% coverage was compromised in 3 of 10 MR-Linac plans due to caudocranial length exceeding the limits of the MR-Linac. MR-Linac plans had lower MUs, median of 689.1 vs 849.65 (p = 0.002), but took over twice as long to deliver, 529.5s vs 224s (p = <0.0001) as VMAT plans. MR-Linac planning and treatment of AC is feasible for a subset of patients. The current physical limitations of the Elekta Unity system mean patients with large caudocranial elective PTV45Gy target volumes may not be covered dosimetrically to the required clinical standard. Longer image verification and treatment delivery times of the MR-Linac also mean patient selection and intrafractional IGRT are likely to be integral to ensuring high quality clinical outcomes in this rare cancer.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33439
DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.07.001
ORCID: 
Journal: Medical Dosimetry: Official Journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists
PubMed URL: 37507334
ISSN: 1873-4022
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Anus
Cancer
MR-Linac
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
VMAT
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.