Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33439
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Drew-
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Kellie-
dc.contributor.authorSim, Jenny-
dc.contributor.authorLim Joon, Daryl-
dc.contributor.authorForoudi, Farshad-
dc.contributor.authorKhoo, Vincent-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-03T00:23:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-03T00:23:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-26-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Dosimetry: Official Journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 2023-07-26, 48(4)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1873-4022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33439-
dc.description.abstractThe hybrid magnetic resonance image (MRI) scanner and radiation therapy linear accelerator (MR-Linac) has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes for anal cancer (AC) patients with improved soft tissue visualization and daily plan adaption but has planning and delivery limitations due to the incorporation of MRI. We aimed to identify if Elekta Unity MR-Linac-based radiation therapy is feasible for anal cancer. Ten prospectively enrolled AC patients treated with radical chemoradiotherapy were replanned for MR-Linac treatment using departmental planning criteria. For comparison, and to reduce interobserver variability, volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy (VMAT) plans were also created for each patient by the same single senior radiation therapist. Plans were compared using departmental dosimetric plan criteria, as well as conformity and homogeneity indices, monitor units (MUs) and measured plan delivery (beam-on) time. Results were deemed clinically acceptable. Target and organ at risk (OAR) doses were comparable between MR-Linac plans and VMAT plans, although PTV45Gy D98% coverage was compromised in 3 of 10 MR-Linac plans due to caudocranial length exceeding the limits of the MR-Linac. MR-Linac plans had lower MUs, median of 689.1 vs 849.65 (p = 0.002), but took over twice as long to deliver, 529.5s vs 224s (p = <0.0001) as VMAT plans. MR-Linac planning and treatment of AC is feasible for a subset of patients. The current physical limitations of the Elekta Unity system mean patients with large caudocranial elective PTV45Gy target volumes may not be covered dosimetrically to the required clinical standard. Longer image verification and treatment delivery times of the MR-Linac also mean patient selection and intrafractional IGRT are likely to be integral to ensuring high quality clinical outcomes in this rare cancer.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAnusen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectMR-Linacen_US
dc.subjectRadiation therapyen_US
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectVMATen_US
dc.titleA planning-based feasibility study of MR-Linac treatment for anal cancer radiation therapy.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleMedical Dosimetry: Official Journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetristsen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centreen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRadiation Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.meddos.2023.07.001en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37507334-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.