Austin Health

Title
Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients' outcomes.
Publication Date
2021-12
Author(s)
Lin, Yuan-Hong
Loon, Wee
Tacey, Mark A
Bolton, Damien M
Tan, Alwin
Chan, Yee
Cham, Chee Wee
Ho, Huong
Guerrieri, Mario
Foroudi, Farshad
Joon, Daryl Lim
McMillan, Kevin
Koufogiannis, George
Manohar, Paul
Liu, Madalena
Pham, Trung
Chao, Michael
Subject
low-dose-rate brachytherapy
prostate cancer
rectal dosimetry
rectal spacer
rectal toxicity
Type of document
Journal Article
OrcId
0000-0002-5145-6783
0000-0002-1947-9694
0000-0002-3497-3746
0000-0003-2948-8495
DOI
10.5114/jcb.2021.112110
Abstract
To report on rectal dosimetry and toxicity outcomes in men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without polyethylene glycol hydrogel (HS) or hyaluronic acid (HA) rectal spacer (RS) insertion. Seventy consecutive men treated with LDR-BT between December 2017 and July 2019 were included in this study, including twenty-eight (40%) men who had RS insertion according to the preference of referring urologist, compared to a group of forty-two men (60%) without RS. Descriptive statistics were used to compare RS safety, dosimetric effects on organs at risk (rectum and urethra), and gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities (GU) (assessed using the CTCAE v.4) between the two groups of patients. The median prostate-rectal separation with RS at mid prostate was 10 mm (IQR, 8-11.5 mm). The median follow-up was 23.5 months. There were no post-operative complications for RS insertion. There was significantly reduced rectal dosimetry in RS-group vs. non-RS group; the median RV100 was 0.0 cc (IQR, 0.0-0.0 cc) vs. 0.4 cc (IQR, 0.1-1.1 cc) (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean rectal D1cc and D2cc were 52.4% vs. 84.2% (p < 0.001) and 45.7% vs. 70.0% (p < 0.001) for RS and non-RS group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean urethral D20, D5, and D1. There were significantly less grade 1 acute and late GI toxicities in RS-group when compared to non-RS group (0% vs. 24%, p = 0.004 for acute GI toxicity; 4% vs. 33%, p = 0.003 for late GI toxicity). There were no reported acute or late grade 2 or above GI toxicities. Insertion of RS in men treated with LDR-BT is safe and resulted in a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. The reduction in rectal dosimetry with RS insertion translates into significantly reduced acute and late GI toxicities.
Link
Citation
Journal of contemporary brachytherapy 2021; 13(6): 605-614
Jornal Title
Journal of contemporary brachytherapy
ISSN
1689-832X

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink