Austin Health

Title
Bone Microarchitecture in Transgender Adults: a Cross Sectional Study.
Publication Date
2022-01-03
Author(s)
Bretherton, Ingrid
Ghasem-Zadeh, Ali
Leemaqz, Shalem Y
Seeman, Ego
Wang, Xiao-Fang
McFarlane, Thomas
Spanos, Cassandra
Grossmann, Mathis
Zajac, Jeffrey D
Cheung, Ada S
Type of document
Journal Article
OrcId
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-9239
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-3205
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-3457
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5257-5525
DOI
10.1002/jbmr.4497
Abstract
Gender-affirming hormone therapy aligns physical characteristics with an individual's gender identity, but sex hormones regulate bone remodelling and influence bone morphology. We hypothesised that trans men receiving testosterone have compromised bone morphology due to suppression of ovarian estradiol production while trans women receiving estradiol, with or without antiandrogen therapy, have preserved bone microarchitecture. We compared distal radial and tibial microarchitecture using high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT images in a cross-sectional study of 41 trans men with 71 cis female controls, and 40 trans women with 51 cis male controls. Between group differences were expressed as standardized deviations (SD) from the mean in age-matched cis gender controls with 98% confidence intervals adjusted for cross sectional area (CSA) and multiple comparisons. Relative to cis women, trans men had 0.63 SD higher total vBMD (both p = 0.01). Cortical vBMD and cortical porosity did not differ, but cortices were 1.11 SD thicker (p < 0.01). Trabeculae were 0.38 SD thicker (p = 0.05) but otherwise no different. Compared to cis men, trans women had 0.68 SD lower total vBMD (p = 0.01). Cortical vBMD was 0.70 SD lower (p < 0.01), cortical thickness was 0.51 SD lower (p = 0.04), cortical porosity was 0.70 SD higher (p<0.01). Trabecular BV/TV was 0.77 SD lower (p < 0.01), with 0.57 SD fewer (p < 0.01) and 0.30 SD thicker trabeculae (p = 0.02). There was 0.56 SD greater trabecular separation (p = 0.01). Findings at the distal radius were similar. Contrary to each hypothesis, bone microarchitecture was not compromised in trans men, perhaps because aromatisation of administered testosterone prevented bone loss. Trans women had deteriorated bone microarchitecture either because of deficits in microstructure before treatment, or because the estradiol dosage was insufficient to offset reduced aromatizable testosterone. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Link
Citation
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research: the Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2022; 37(4): 643-648
Jornal Title
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink