Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28549
Title: Preoperative Imaging in Patients with Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE): An Important aid in Predicting Depth of Infiltration in Rectosigmoid Disease.
Austin Authors: Sloss, Samantha;Mooney, Samantha;Ellett, Lenore;Readman, Emma;Ma, Tony;Brouwer, Richard;Yang, Natalie ;Stone, Kate;Maher, Peter;Ireland-Jenkin, Kerryn 
Affiliation: Department of Gynaecology (Drs. Sloss, Mooney, Ellett, Readman, and Ma and Prof Maher)..
Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg
Anatomical Pathology
Department of Colorectal Surgery (Mr Brouwer)..
Department of Radiology (Dr Yang)..
Issue Date: May-2022
Date: 2022-01-03
Publication information: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2022; 29(5): 633-640
Abstract: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of specialist transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities in predicting depth of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) of the rectosigmoid by comparison with histological specimens obtained at surgery. A retrospective analysis, which met the STARD (2015) guidelines for a diagnostic accuracy study. Tertiary teaching hospital. 194 cases who underwent preoperative discussion at the Gynaecological Endosurgery Unit multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) between January 2012 and December 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Retrospective assessment of the accuracy of TVUS and MRI in predicting histological depth of rectosigmoid DIE following operative management. 135 surgeries were performed for DIE; 20 underwent a rectal shave, 14 had a disc/wedge resection, 38 an anterior/segmental resection, 63 had no rectosigmoid surgery. Of the 52 patients with full thickness rectal wall excision, all patients had at least one imaging modality available for review; 42 (81%) had both. At least one imaging modality was in agreement with histological depth in 48 (92%) cases (sensitivity 94%, specificity 50%, positive predictive values (PPV) 97.9%, negative predictive value (NPV) 25.0%; area under the receiver operating curves (AUROC) 0.720, 95%CI: 0.229, 1.000). When TVUS was assessed in isolation, the test remained sensitive for any rectal wall involvement (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 50.0%, PPV 97.8%, NPV 25.0%; AUROC 0.718, 95%CI: 0.227, 1.000). When only MRI was assessed, the test demonstrated both high sensitivity and specificity for rectal wall disease (sensitivity 86.4%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 14.2). Specialised performed TVUS and MRI are accurate in predicting depth of disease in rectosigmoid endometriosis. These modalities were similar in their diagnostic performance at assessing depth of rectal wall involvement and their use is justified in the preoperative planning of these gynaecological surgeries.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28549
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.12.015
ORCID: 0000-0002-6957-8949
Journal: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
PubMed URL: 34990811
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34990811/
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: deep infiltrating endometriosis
diagnostic accuracy
magnetic resonance imaging
surgical approach
transvaginal ultrasound
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Oct 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.