Austin Health

Title
Significant detection of new germline pathogenic variants in Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program participants.
Publication Date
2021-08-16
Author(s)
Murali, Krithika
Dwarte, Tanya M
Nikfarjam, Mehrdad
Tucker, Katherine M
Vaughan, Rhys B
Efthymiou, Marios
Collins, Allison L
Spigelman, Allan D
Salmon, Lucinda
Johns, Amber L
Williams, David B
Delatycki, Martin B
John, Thomas
Stoita, Alina
Subject
Cancer screening
Genetic testing
Genetics
Hereditary Cancer syndromes
Pancreatic cancer
Pathogenic variant
Type of document
Journal Article
OrcId
0000-0001-5581-2039
0000-0003-0918-7820
0000-0003-4866-276X
0000-0002-7180-6576
0000-0002-4557-1734
0000-0003-2569-5163
0000-0002-7362-4637
0000-0002-7409-1684
0000-0001-8550-0829
0000-0002-1948-6683
0000-0002-0808-0311
0000-0002-8769-2569
0000-0003-3399-5342
0000-0001-9460-2149
DOI
10.1186/s13053-021-00190-1
Abstract
The Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program (APCSP) offers endoscopic ultrasound surveillance for individuals at increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with all participants requiring assessment by a Familial Cancer Service before or after study enrolment. Individuals aged 40-80 years (or 10 years younger than the earliest PDAC diagnosis) were eligible for APCSP study entry if they had 1) ≥ two blood relatives with PDAC (at least one of first-degree association); 2) a clinical or genetic diagnosis of Hereditary Pancreatitis or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome irrespective of PDAC family history; or 3) a known PDAC predisposition germline pathogenic variant (BRCA2, PALB2, CDKN2A, or Lynch syndrome) with ≥one PDAC-affected first- or second-degree relative. Retrospective medical record review was conducted for APCSP participants enrolled at the participating Australian hospitals from January 2011 to December 2019. We audited the genetic investigations offered by multiple Familial Cancer Services who assessed APCSP participants according to national guidelines, local clinical protocol and/or the availability of external research-funded testing, and the subsequent findings. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. Of 189 kindreds (285 participants), 50 kindreds (71 participants) had a known germline pathogenic variant at enrolment (BRCA2 n = 35, PALB2 n = 6, CDKN2A n = 3, STK11 n = 3, PRSS1 n = 2, MLH1 n = 1). Forty-eight of 136 (35%) kindreds with no known germline pathogenic variant were offered mutation analysis; 89% was clinic-funded, with increasing self-funded testing since 2016. The relatively low rates of genetic testing performed reflects initial strict criteria for clinic-funded genetic testing. New germline pathogenic variants were detected in five kindreds (10.4%) after study enrolment (BRCA2 n = 3 kindreds, PALB2 n = 1, CDKN2A n = 1). Of note, only eight kindreds were reassessed by a Familial Cancer Service since enrolment, with a further 21 kindreds identified as being suitable for reassessment. Germline pathogenic variants associated with PDAC were seen in 29.1% of our high-risk cohort (55/189 kindreds; 82/285 participants). Importantly, 10.4% of kindreds offered genetic testing were newly identified as having germline pathogenic variants, with majority being BRCA2. As genetic testing standards evolve rapidly in PDAC, 5-yearly reassessment of high-risk individuals by Familial Cancer Services is warranted.
Link
Citation
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 2021; 19(1): 33
Jornal Title
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
ISSN
1731-2302

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
27305.pdf 2442.048 KB application/pdf View document