Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26051
Title: Pathway for enhanced recovery after spinal surgery-a systematic review of evidence for use of individual components.
Austin Authors: Licina, Ana ;Silvers, Andrew;Laughlin, Harry;Russell, Jeremy H ;Wan, Crispin
Affiliation: Austin Health
St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Neurosurgery
Monash Health, Clayton, Australia, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Issue Date: 10-Mar-2021
Date: 2021-03-10
Publication information: BMC Anesthesiology 2021; 21(1): 74
Abstract: Enhanced recovery in spinal surgery (ERSS) has shown promising improvements in clinical and economical outcomes. We have proposed an ERSS pathway based on available evidence. We aimed to delineate the clinical efficacy of individual pathway components in ERSS through a systematic narrative review. We included systematic reviews and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled studies, and observational studies in adults and pediatric patients evaluating any one of the 22 pre-defined components. Our primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, morbidity outcomes (e.g., pulmonary, cardiac, renal, surgical complications), patient-reported outcomes and experiences (e.g., pain, quality of care experience), and health services outcomes (e.g., length of stay and costs). Following databases (1990 onwards) were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Two authors screened the citations, full-text articles, and extracted data. A narrative synthesis was provided. We constructed Evidence Profile (EP) tables for each component of the pathway, where appropriate information was available. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we did not conduct a meta-analyses. GRADE system was used to classify confidence in cumulative evidence for each component of the pathway. We identified 5423 relevant studies excluding duplicates as relating to the 22 pre-defined components of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery. We included 664 studies in the systematic review. We identified specific evidence within the context of spinal surgery for 14/22 proposed components. Evidence was summarized in EP tables where suitable. We performed thematic synthesis without EP for 6/22 elements. We identified appropriate societal guidelines for the remainder of the components. We identified the following components with high quality of evidence as per GRADE system: pre-emptive analgesia, peri-operative blood conservation (antifibrinolytic use), surgical site preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis. There was moderate level of evidence for implementation of prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery, multimodal perioperative analgesia, intravenous lignocaine and ketamine use as well as early mobilization. This review allows for the first formalized evidence-based unified protocol in the field of ERSS. Further studies validating the multimodal ERSS framework are essential to guide the future evolution of care in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26051
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01281-1
ORCID: 0000-0001-8897-0156
Journal: BMC Anesthesiology
PubMed URL: 33691620
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Enhanced recovery after spinal surgery (ERSS)
Perioperative outcomes
Perioperative pathway
Systematic review;
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on May 31, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.