Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25434
Title: | The development and psychometric evaluation of the Clinicians' Attitudes towards Responding and Escalating care of Deteriorating patients scale. | Austin Authors: | Chua, Wei Ling;Tee, Augustine;Hassan, Norasyikin Binte;Jones, Daryl A ;Tam, Wilson Wai San;Liaw, Sok Ying | Affiliation: | Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11, Level 2, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore Intensive Care Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Nursing Education and Research, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore |
Issue Date: | Jul-2021 | Date: | 2020-10-23 | Publication information: | Australian Critical Care 2021; 34(4): 340-349 | Abstract: | Validated measures of ward nurses' safety cultures in relation to escalations of care in deteriorating patients are lacking. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Clinicians' Attitudes towards Responding and Escalating care of Deteriorating patients (CARED) scale for use among ward nurses. The study was conducted in two phases: scale development and psychometric evaluation. The scale items were developed based on a systematic literature review, informant interviews, and expert reviews (n = 15). The reliability and validity of the scale were examined by administering the scale to 617 registered nurses with retest evaluations (n = 60). The factor structure of the CARED scale was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-group validity of the scale were also analysed. A high overall content validity index of 0.95 was obtained from the validations of 15 international experts from seven countries. A three-factor solution was identified from the final 22 items: 'beliefs about rapid response system', 'fears about escalating care', and 'perceived confidence in responding to deteriorating patients'. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was supported with a good Cronbach's alpha value of 0.86 and a Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient of 0.87. An excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92. The convergent validity of the scale was supported with an existing validated scale. The CARED scale also demonstrated abilities to discriminate differences among the sample characteristics. The final 22-item CARED scale was tested to be a reliable and valid scale in the Singaporean setting. The scale may be used in other settings to review hospitals' rapid response systems and to identify strategies to support ward nurses in the process of escalating care in deteriorating ward patients. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25434 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.08.008 | Journal: | Australian Critical Care | PubMed URL: | 33250402 | ISSN: | 1036-7314 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Clinical deterioration Escalation of care Medical emergency team Nurse Patient safety Rapid response system Scale development Ward patients |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.