Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChua, Wei Ling-
dc.contributor.authorTee, Augustine-
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Norasyikin Binte-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daryl A-
dc.contributor.authorTam, Wilson Wai San-
dc.contributor.authorLiaw, Sok Ying-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Critical Care 2021; 34(4): 340-349en
dc.description.abstractValidated measures of ward nurses' safety cultures in relation to escalations of care in deteriorating patients are lacking. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Clinicians' Attitudes towards Responding and Escalating care of Deteriorating patients (CARED) scale for use among ward nurses. The study was conducted in two phases: scale development and psychometric evaluation. The scale items were developed based on a systematic literature review, informant interviews, and expert reviews (n = 15). The reliability and validity of the scale were examined by administering the scale to 617 registered nurses with retest evaluations (n = 60). The factor structure of the CARED scale was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-group validity of the scale were also analysed. A high overall content validity index of 0.95 was obtained from the validations of 15 international experts from seven countries. A three-factor solution was identified from the final 22 items: 'beliefs about rapid response system', 'fears about escalating care', and 'perceived confidence in responding to deteriorating patients'. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was supported with a good Cronbach's alpha value of 0.86 and a Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient of 0.87. An excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92. The convergent validity of the scale was supported with an existing validated scale. The CARED scale also demonstrated abilities to discriminate differences among the sample characteristics. The final 22-item CARED scale was tested to be a reliable and valid scale in the Singaporean setting. The scale may be used in other settings to review hospitals' rapid response systems and to identify strategies to support ward nurses in the process of escalating care in deteriorating ward patients.en
dc.subjectClinical deteriorationen
dc.subjectEscalation of careen
dc.subjectMedical emergency teamen
dc.subjectPatient safetyen
dc.subjectRapid response systemen
dc.subjectScale developmenten
dc.subjectWard patientsen
dc.titleThe development and psychometric evaluation of the Clinicians' Attitudes towards Responding and Escalating care of Deteriorating patients scale.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Critical Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11, Level 2, 10 Medical Drive, Singaporeen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singaporeen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing Education and Research, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singaporeen
dc.identifier.pubmedid33250402-, Daryl A
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en- Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 1, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.