Austin Health

Title
Impact of COVID-19 on medical education: introducing homo digitalis.
Publication Date
2021-06
Author(s)
Gravas, Stavros
Ahmad, Mumtaz
Hernández-Porras, Andrés
Furriel, Frederico
Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
Kumar, Anant
Lee, Kyu-Sung
Azodoh, Evaristus
Mburugu, Patrick
Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
Bolton, Damien M
Gomez, Reynaldo
Klotz, Laurence
Kulkarni, Sanjay
Tanguay, Simon
Elliott, Sean
de la Rosette, Jean
Subject
COVID-19
Coronavirus
Medical education
Online learning
Social media
Urology
Type of document
Journal Article
OrcId
0000-0001-7805-6651
DOI
10.1007/s00345-020-03417-3
Abstract
To determine how members of the Société Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) are continuing their education in the time of COVID-19. A survey was disseminated amongst SIU members worldwide by email. Results were analyzed to examine the influence of age, practice region and settings on continuing medical education (CME) of the respondents. In total, 2494 respondents completed the survey. Internet searching was the most common method of CME (76%; all ps < 0.001), followed by searching journals and textbook including the online versions (62%; all ps < 0.001). Overall, 6% of the respondents reported no time/interest for CME during the pandemic. Although most urologists report using only one platform for their CME (26.6%), the majority reported using ≥ 2 platforms, with approximately 10% of the respondents using up to 5 different platforms. Urologists < 40 years old were more likely to use online literature (69%), podcasts/AV media (38%), online CME courses/webinars (40%), and social media (39%). There were regional variations in the CME modality used but no significant difference in the number of methods by region. There was no significant difference in responses between urologists in academic/public hospitals or private practice. During COVID-19, urologists have used web-based learning for their CME. Internet learning and literature were the top frequently cited learning methods. Younger urologists are more likely to use all forms of digital learning methods, while older urologists prefer fewer methods.
Link
Citation
World Journal of Urology 2021; 39(6): 1997-2003
Jornal Title
World Journal of Urology

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink