Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19760
Title: | Role of bone marrow biopsy for fever of unknown origin in the contemporary Australian context. | Austin Authors: | Hong, Frank S;Fox, Lucy C;Chai, Khai Li;Htun, Kay;Clucas, Danielle;Morgan, Susan;Cole-Sinclair, Merrole F;Juneja, Surender | Affiliation: | Department of Laboratory Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia Alfred Health Prahran, Victoria St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Fitzroy, Victoria Diagnostic Haematology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Laboratory Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Fitzroy, Victoria Laboratory Haematology, Alfred Health Prahran, Victoria The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Date: | 2018-10-22 | Publication information: | Internal Medicine Journal 2019; 49(7): 850-854 | Abstract: | Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is an accepted investigation in fever of unknown origin (FUO) to uncover haematological malignancies such as lymphoma, and sometimes infections. With the advance in imaging modalities, such as 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to identify the focus of lymphoma, BMB may not contribute to the diagnosis when there are no other clinical features to suggest an underlying haematological disease. To investigate the utility of BMB in determining the cause of FUO, when there are no other indications for BMB. Medical records of adult patients who had BMB performed for FUO or febrile illness from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014 in four metropolitan tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia were reviewed. Patients with other concurrent indications for BMB, known HIV infection and previously diagnosed connective tissue diseases were excluded. Seventy-three patients were included in the study. Fifty-one patients had a final diagnosis for fever (systemic inflammatory diseases, infective, malignancy or other) while 22 patients had no diagnoses. In only 10 patients (13.7%) did BMB contribute to the diagnosis, finding either malignancy or granulomata. However, all these diagnoses could have been made without BMB. Two patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had normal BMBs. FDG-PET was helpful in making a diagnosis in eight (25%) out of 32 patients. Performing BMB in patients with FUO and no other haematological abnormalities is of very limited value, and other investigations such as FDG-PET, may be more likely to help establish a definitive diagnosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19760 | DOI: | 10.1111/imj.14147 | ORCID: | 0000-0001-8331-2154 | Journal: | Internal Medicine Journal | PubMed URL: | 30350441 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | bone marrow examination clinical laboratory diagnoses fever of unknown origin positron-emission tomography |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.