Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHong, Frank S-
dc.contributor.authorFox, Lucy C-
dc.contributor.authorChai, Khai Li-
dc.contributor.authorHtun, Kay-
dc.contributor.authorClucas, Danielle-
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Susan-
dc.contributor.authorCole-Sinclair, Merrole F-
dc.contributor.authorJuneja, Surender-
dc.date2018-10-22-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-04T23:50:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-04T23:50:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationInternal Medicine Journal 2019; 49(7): 850-854-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19760-
dc.description.abstractBone marrow biopsy (BMB) is an accepted investigation in fever of unknown origin (FUO) to uncover haematological malignancies such as lymphoma, and sometimes infections. With the advance in imaging modalities, such as 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to identify the focus of lymphoma, BMB may not contribute to the diagnosis when there are no other clinical features to suggest an underlying haematological disease. To investigate the utility of BMB in determining the cause of FUO, when there are no other indications for BMB. Medical records of adult patients who had BMB performed for FUO or febrile illness from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014 in four metropolitan tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia were reviewed. Patients with other concurrent indications for BMB, known HIV infection and previously diagnosed connective tissue diseases were excluded. Seventy-three patients were included in the study. Fifty-one patients had a final diagnosis for fever (systemic inflammatory diseases, infective, malignancy or other) while 22 patients had no diagnoses. In only 10 patients (13.7%) did BMB contribute to the diagnosis, finding either malignancy or granulomata. However, all these diagnoses could have been made without BMB. Two patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had normal BMBs. FDG-PET was helpful in making a diagnosis in eight (25%) out of 32 patients. Performing BMB in patients with FUO and no other haematological abnormalities is of very limited value, and other investigations such as FDG-PET, may be more likely to help establish a definitive diagnosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectbone marrow examination-
dc.subjectclinical laboratory diagnoses-
dc.subjectfever of unknown origin-
dc.subjectpositron-emission tomography-
dc.titleRole of bone marrow biopsy for fever of unknown origin in the contemporary Australian context.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternal Medicine Journal-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Laboratory Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAlfred Health Prahran, Victoriaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Fitzroy, Victoriaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDiagnostic Haematology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationLaboratory Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Fitzroy, Victoriaen
dc.identifier.affiliationLaboratory Haematology, Alfred Health Prahran, Victoriaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/imj.14147-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8331-2154-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30350441-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.