Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Contact Aspiration versus Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for Distal Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Meta-Analysis.
Austin Authors: Phan, Kevin;Maingard, Julian;Kok, Hong Kuan;Dmytriw, Adam A;Goyal, Sourabh;Chandra, Ronil;Brooks, Duncan Mark ;Thijs, Vincent N ;Asadi, Hamed 
Affiliation: Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Monash Imaging, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Australia
Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
Interventional Neuroradiology Service, Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Department of Radiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Issue Date: Sep-2018
Date: 2018-08-31
Publication information: Neurointervention 2018; 13(2): 100-109
Abstract: The evidence for endovascular therapy and choice of technique in distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) M2 segment occlusions in acute ischemic stroke remains controversial. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis primarily comparing reperfusion rates of stent-retrieval versus contact aspiration for M2 occlusions. Study selection included cohorts of patients with distal MCA occlusions in acute ischemic strokes treated with an endovascular approach including stent-retrieval or contact aspiration. Twelve studies were selected for meta-analysis for a total of 835 cases. Meta-analysis by proportions was conducted on parameters including baseline and procedural characteristics, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3 outcomes, and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) outcomes. Hypertension and hyperlipidemia were more prevalent in stent-retriever patients. Pooled baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores and Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score imaging scores were similar. Pooled time onset of symptoms to door arrival was higher for the stent-retrieval group (154 vs. 97.4 minutes, P=0.01), as was time to groin puncture (259.9 vs. 156.2 minutes, P=0.02), but there was no difference in procedure time. The TICI 2b-3 recanalization rate was similar (80.5% vs. 86.8%, P=0.168). The frequency of mRS 0-2 at 90-day was also similar (74.5% vs. 59.9%, P=0.120), and an excellent mRS 0-1 was lower for stent-retrievers (39.9% vs. 65.6%, P=0.003). A significant negative correlation was found between onset to groin puncture time and the proportion of patients with a good mRS (r=-0.71, P=0.048). Both endovascular techniques achieved recanalization rates greater than 80% and 90-day outcomes of minimal disability with similar complication rates. The literature is skewed by aspiration cases being performed sooner after onset of stroke compared to stent-retriever cases.
DOI: 10.5469/neuroint.2018.00997
ORCID: 0000-0001-8958-2411
Journal: Neurointervention
PubMed URL: 30196680
ISSN: 2093-9043
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Cerebrovascular disorders
Endovascular procedures
Middle cerebral artery
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 10, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.