Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18133
Title: | Global Cardioplegia Practices: Results from the Global Cardiopulmonary Bypass Survey. | Austin Authors: | Ali, Jason M;Miles, Lachlan F ;Abu-Omar, Yasir;Galhardo, Carlos;Falter, Florian | Affiliation: | Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK Department of Anesthesiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Rio-de-Janiero, Brazil Department of Anesthesia, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK |
Issue Date: | Jun-2018 | Publication information: | The journal of extra-corporeal technology 2018; 50(2): 83-93 | Abstract: | Despite the ubiquitous use of cardioplegia in cardiac surgery, there is a lack of agreement on various aspects of cardioplegia practice. To discover current cardioplegia practices throughout the world, we undertook a global survey to document contemporary cardiopulmonary bypass practices. A 16-question, Internet-based survey was distributed by regional specialist societies, targeting adult cardiac anesthesiologists. Ten questions concerned caseload and cardioplegia practices, the remaining questions examined anticoagulation and pump-priming practices. The survey was available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The survey was launched in June 2015 and remained open until May 2016. A total of 923 responses were analyzed, summarizing practice in Europe (269), North America (334), South America (215), and Australia/New Zealand (105). Inter-regional responses differed for all questions asked (p < .001). In all regions other than South America, blood cardioplegia was the common arrest technique used. The most commonly used cardioplegia solutions were: St. Thomas, Bretschneider, and University of Wisconsin with significant regional variation. The use of additives (most commonly glucose, glutamate, tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane, and aspartate) varied significantly. This survey has revealed significant variation in international practice with regards to myocardial protection, and is a reminder that there is no clear consensus on the use of cardioplegia. It is unclear why regional practice groups made the choices they have and the clinical impact remains unclear. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18133 | Journal: | The journal of extra-corporeal technology | PubMed URL: | 29921986 | ISSN: | 0022-1058 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | blood cardioplegia cardiopulmonary bypass crystalloid |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.