Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18133
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Jason M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Miles, Lachlan F | - |
dc.contributor.author | Abu-Omar, Yasir | - |
dc.contributor.author | Galhardo, Carlos | - |
dc.contributor.author | Falter, Florian | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-07T06:30:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-07T06:30:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The journal of extra-corporeal technology 2018; 50(2): 83-93 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1058 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18133 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Despite the ubiquitous use of cardioplegia in cardiac surgery, there is a lack of agreement on various aspects of cardioplegia practice. To discover current cardioplegia practices throughout the world, we undertook a global survey to document contemporary cardiopulmonary bypass practices. A 16-question, Internet-based survey was distributed by regional specialist societies, targeting adult cardiac anesthesiologists. Ten questions concerned caseload and cardioplegia practices, the remaining questions examined anticoagulation and pump-priming practices. The survey was available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The survey was launched in June 2015 and remained open until May 2016. A total of 923 responses were analyzed, summarizing practice in Europe (269), North America (334), South America (215), and Australia/New Zealand (105). Inter-regional responses differed for all questions asked (p < .001). In all regions other than South America, blood cardioplegia was the common arrest technique used. The most commonly used cardioplegia solutions were: St. Thomas, Bretschneider, and University of Wisconsin with significant regional variation. The use of additives (most commonly glucose, glutamate, tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane, and aspartate) varied significantly. This survey has revealed significant variation in international practice with regards to myocardial protection, and is a reminder that there is no clear consensus on the use of cardioplegia. It is unclear why regional practice groups made the choices they have and the clinical impact remains unclear. | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.subject | blood | - |
dc.subject | cardioplegia | - |
dc.subject | cardiopulmonary bypass | - |
dc.subject | crystalloid | - |
dc.title | Global Cardioplegia Practices: Results from the Global Cardiopulmonary Bypass Survey. | - |
dc.type | Journal Article | - |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | The journal of extra-corporeal technology | - |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia | - |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK | - |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Department of Anesthesiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Rio-de-Janiero, Brazil | - |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Department of Anesthesia, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK | - |
dc.identifier.pubmedid | 29921986 | - |
dc.type.austin | Journal Article | - |
local.name.researcher | Miles, Lachlan F | |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Anaesthesia | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.