Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: An audit of the accuracy of medication information in electronic medical discharge summaries linked to an electronic prescribing system.
Austin Authors: Tan, Yixin;Elliott, Rohan A ;Richardson, Belinda ;Tanner, Francine E ;Dorevitch, Michael I 
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Monash University, Australia
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2018
Date: 2018-01-01
Publication information: Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia 2018; 47(3): 125-131
Abstract: Poor communication of medication information to general practitioners when patients are discharged from hospital is a widely recognised problem. There has been little research exploring the accuracy of medication information in electronic discharge summaries (EDS) linked to hospital e-prescribing systems. To evaluate the accuracy of medication lists and medication change information in EDS produced using an integrated e-prescribing and EDS system (where EDS discharge medication lists were imported from discharge e-prescription records, medication change information was manually entered, and medications were dispensed from paper copies of the patients' e-prescriptions). Retrospective audit of EDSs for a random sample, representative of adult patients ( n = 87) discharged from a major teaching hospital. EDS medication lists were compared to pharmacist-verified paper discharge prescriptions (considered to be the most accurate discharge medication list) to identify discrepancies. EDS medication change information was compared to medication changes identified by comparing pharmacist-verified "Medication History on Admission" forms with pharmacist-verified paper discharge prescriptions. There were 85/87 (98%) EDSs that included a discharge medication list. Of these, 50/85 (59%) contained one or more medication list discrepancies (median 1, range 0-15). The most common discrepancy was omission of medication (58%); 84/131 (64%) discrepancies were considered clinically significant (risk of adverse outcome); 162/351 (46%) clinically significant medication changes were stated in the EDS; and 153/351 (44%) changes were both stated and included a reason. EDS discrepancies were common despite integration with e-prescribing. Eliminating paper prescriptions, enhancing e-prescribing/EDS functionality and involving pharmacists in EDS preparation may reduce discrepancies.
DOI: 10.1177/1833358318765192
Journal: Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia
PubMed URL: 29587532
ISSN: 1322-4913
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: continuity of patient care
electronic health records
electronic prescribing
patient discharge summaries
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on May 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.