Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17998
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, Yixin-
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Rohan A-
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Belinda-
dc.contributor.authorTanner, Francine E-
dc.contributor.authorDorevitch, Michael I-
dc.date2018-01-01-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-02T04:00:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-02T04:00:31Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationHealth information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia 2018; 47(3): 125-131-
dc.identifier.issn1322-4913-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17998-
dc.description.abstractPoor communication of medication information to general practitioners when patients are discharged from hospital is a widely recognised problem. There has been little research exploring the accuracy of medication information in electronic discharge summaries (EDS) linked to hospital e-prescribing systems. To evaluate the accuracy of medication lists and medication change information in EDS produced using an integrated e-prescribing and EDS system (where EDS discharge medication lists were imported from discharge e-prescription records, medication change information was manually entered, and medications were dispensed from paper copies of the patients' e-prescriptions). Retrospective audit of EDSs for a random sample, representative of adult patients ( n = 87) discharged from a major teaching hospital. EDS medication lists were compared to pharmacist-verified paper discharge prescriptions (considered to be the most accurate discharge medication list) to identify discrepancies. EDS medication change information was compared to medication changes identified by comparing pharmacist-verified "Medication History on Admission" forms with pharmacist-verified paper discharge prescriptions. There were 85/87 (98%) EDSs that included a discharge medication list. Of these, 50/85 (59%) contained one or more medication list discrepancies (median 1, range 0-15). The most common discrepancy was omission of medication (58%); 84/131 (64%) discrepancies were considered clinically significant (risk of adverse outcome); 162/351 (46%) clinically significant medication changes were stated in the EDS; and 153/351 (44%) changes were both stated and included a reason. EDS discrepancies were common despite integration with e-prescribing. Eliminating paper prescriptions, enhancing e-prescribing/EDS functionality and involving pharmacists in EDS preparation may reduce discrepancies.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcontinuity of patient care-
dc.subjectelectronic health records-
dc.subjectelectronic prescribing-
dc.subjecthospitals-
dc.subjectpatient discharge summaries-
dc.titleAn audit of the accuracy of medication information in electronic medical discharge summaries linked to an electronic prescribing system.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleHealth information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash University, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1833358318765192-
dc.identifier.pubmedid29587532-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherDorevitch, Michael I
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptPharmacy-
crisitem.author.deptPharmacy-
crisitem.author.deptPharmacy-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.