Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A systematic review of acupuncture for sleep quality in people with insomnia
Austin Authors: Shergis, JL;Ni, X;Jackson, Melinda L ;Zhang, AL;Guo, X;Li, Y;Lu, C;Xue, CC
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Guangzhou, China
The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 2016
Date: 2016-02-18
Publication information: Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2016; 26: 11-20
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Acupuncture is widely used in Asia and increasingly in Western countries. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effects of acupuncture for insomnia. METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials from English and Chinese databases. Data were extracted using a predefined form and analysed using RevMan 5.2. We included studies that compared acupuncture to sham/placebo, standard pharmacotherapy or cognitive behavioral therapy. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was sleep quality assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). RESULTS: A total of 30 studies involving 2363 participants were included. Acupuncture point combinations included the use of at least one of the recommended points for insomnia, HT7, GV20, SP6. Pharmacotherapy control was used in 27 studies and sham/placebo in three studies. Cognitive behavioral therapy was not used in any of the studies. Pharmacotherapies in all studies were benzodiazepine receptor agonists, except for one that used an antidepressant. Acupuncture was superior to sham/placebo in terms of PSQI (MD -0.79, 95% CI -1.38, -0.19, I(2)=49%). Acupuncture was also more effective than pharmacotherapy (MD -2.76, 95% CI -3.67, -1.85, I(2)=94%). Most studies were at risk of bias. Some mild adverse events were reported but they were not causally related to the acupuncture treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture compared to sham/placebo and pharmacotherapy showed statistically significant results. However, the evidence is limited by bias in the included studies and heterogeneity. Well-designed studies are needed to confirm the results identified in this review.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.02.007
Journal: Complementary Therapies in Medicine
PubMed URL:
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Acupuncture
Randomized controlled trial
Systematic review
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Systematic Reviews
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Jul 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.