Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11100
Title: Emergency department abdominal x-rays have a poor diagnostic yield and their usefulness is questionable.
Austin Authors: Jackson, Kirsty;Taylor, David McD ;Judkins, Simon 
Affiliation: Emergency Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia 3084.
Issue Date: 15-Aug-2010
Publication information: Emergency Medicine Journal : Emj 2010; 28(9): 745-9
Abstract: To determine the prevalence and nature of new clinically significant abdominal x-ray (AXR) findings and the proportion of patients receiving additional imaging in the emergency department (ED).This was a retrospective audit of consecutive adult patients, who presented to a tertiary referral ED (annual census 70,000) between September and December 2008. Data were extracted from radiologist reports and the medical records of patients with new significant AXR findings. The electronic radiology record was further interrogated to determine which patients received additional imaging and whether this correlated with the original AXR findings.Of 997 cases that met the inclusion criteria, 121 (12.1%, 95% CI 10.2 to 14.4) and 43 (4.3%, 95% CI 3.2 to 5.8) had new clinically significant and insignificant AXR findings, respectively. Among the significant findings, the predominant diagnoses were bowel obstruction (72.7%), renal calculi (14.0%) and sigmoid volvulus (5.0%). Patient signs and symptoms were poorly associated with significant AXR findings. In all, 334 (33.5%, 95% CI 30.6 to 36.5) cases had additional imaging after the AXR. However, more patients with clinically significant AXR findings went on to have additional imaging (difference in proportions 23.0%, 95% CI 13.2 to 32.9, p<0.001).The yield for clinically useful information from the AXR is low and this investigation may be overused. Positive findings are associated mostly with bowel obstruction. As the proportion of patients ordered additional imaging was considerable, the utility of the preliminary AXR is questionable, especially in cases where the diagnosis is clear. Guidelines for AXR imaging are recommended to assist clinicians with investigation ordering.
Gov't Doc #: 20713362
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11100
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2010.094730
Journal: Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20713362
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Adult
Emergency Service, Hospital.statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Male
Medical Audit
Radiography, Abdominal.standards
Retrospective Studies
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Nov 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.