Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||An assessment of early tracheostomy after anterior cervical stabilization in patients with acute cervical spine trauma.||Austin Authors:||Berney, Susan C ;Opdam, Helen Ingrid;Bellomo, Rinaldo ;Liew, Susan;Skinner, Elizabeth H;Egi, Moritoki;Denehy, Linda||Affiliation:||Department of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia||Issue Date:||1-Mar-2008||Publication information:||The Journal of Trauma; 64(3): 749-53||Abstract:||The optimal timing of tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine surgery remains controversial because of the potential for deep infection. The aims of this study were to compare the infection rates in patients requiring tracheostomy who underwent anterior versus posterior cervical spine surgery, and to report the timing of tracheostomy tube placement in such patients.All patients admitted to a referral Intensive Care Unit for spinal trauma from January 1998 until May 2005, who underwent surgical stabilization with instrumentation and also received a tracheostomy, were retrospectively evaluated for demographic data, severity of neurologic injury, and complications including infection to a surgical site and timing and type of tracheostomy procedure.We identified 71 patients, all who had a diagnosis of acute cervical spine injury. Thirty-two (45%) underwent anterior stabilization, 15 (21%) had posterior stabilizations, and 24 (34%) required both anterior and posterior approaches. The mean time from stabilization to tracheostomy for an anterior approach was 3.8 +/- 2.6 days. There was no significant difference in the timing of tracheostomy for different surgical approaches. Seventeen patients (25%) had a positive culture of their cervical and or tracheostomy incision site. Only one patient, however, had infection with the same organism at both the tracheostomy site and the anterior stabilization site. Suspected infection was managed with antibiotics and no further surgical intervention was required.Early tracheostomy after spinal stabilization is associated with a low risk of infection even after the anterior approach.||Gov't Doc #:||18332819||URI:||http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10556||DOI:||10.1097/.TA.0b013e31802c8234||Journal:||The Journal of trauma||URL:||https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18332819||Type:||Journal Article||Subjects:||Adolescent
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis of Variance
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Show full item record
checked on Jan 27, 2023
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.