Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: To screen or not to screen--that is the question in perinatal depression.
Austin Authors: Buist, Anne ;Barnett, Bryanne E W;Milgrom, Jeannette ;Pope, Sherryl;Condon, John T;Ellwood, David A;Boyce, Phillip M;Austin, Marie-Paule V;Hayes, Barbara A
Affiliation: Austin & Repatriation Hospital, University of Melbourne, Building 129A, Repatriation Campus, Locked Bag 1, West Heidelberg, VIC 3081, Australia
Issue Date: 7-Oct-2002
Publication information: Medical Journal of Australia 2002; 177 Suppl(): S101-5
Abstract: Significant perinatal distress and depression affects 14% of women, producing short and long term consequences for the family. This suggests that measures for early detection are important, and non-identification of these women may exacerbate difficulties. Screening provides an opportunity to access large numbers of women and facilitate pathways to best-practice care. A valid, reliable, economical screening tool (the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS) is available. Arguments against screening pertain largely to lack of evidence about the acceptability of routine use of the EPDS during pregnancy and the postnatal period, and inadequate evidence regarding outcomes and cost-effectiveness. To address these concerns, the National Postnatal Depression Prevention and Early Intervention Program will evaluate outcomes of screening in terms of acceptability, cost-effectiveness, access and satisfaction with management in up to 100 000 women.
Gov't Doc #: 12358566
ORCID: 0000-0002-4082-4595
Journal: Medical Journal of Australia
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Australia
Depression, Postpartum.diagnosis.therapy
Depressive Disorder.diagnosis.therapy
Pregnancy Complications.diagnosis.therapy
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 30, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.