Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Paired associate performance in the early detection of DAT.||Austin Authors:||Fowler, Kylie S;Saling, Michael M ;Conway, Elizabeth L;Semple, James M;Louis, William J||Affiliation:||Department of Neuropsychology, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia||Issue Date:||1-Jan-2002||Publication information:||Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : Jins; 8(1): 58-71||Abstract:||Subjects underwent longitudinal neuropsychological assessment in order to retrospectively determine which measures of cognitive function best predicted later development of dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Three groups of subjects were studied: normal controls, patients with early DAT, and questionable dementia subjects (QD). All subjects were assessed using a battery of standard neuropsychological measures and two subtests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), paired associate learning and delayed matching to sample. A structured interview was also used to elicit a profile of the subject's daily functioning. Subjects were assessed every 6 months for 2 years. At the 6 month assessment, almost half of the QD group exhibited significant deterioration in scores on the computerized paired associate learning subtest, while maintaining their scores on standard measures. At the conclusion of the study, all of this QD subgroup fulfilled the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for probable DAT pertaining to significant cognitive and functional deterioration. Performance on the C||Gov't Doc #:||11843075||URI:||http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9384||URL:||https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11843075||Type:||Journal Article||Subjects:||Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Show full item record
checked on Dec 6, 2022
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.