Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35380
Title: | Direct Oral Challenge for Low-Risk Sulfonamide Allergy: Safety and Antimicrobial Stewardship Impacts in Hospitalised Patients. | Austin Authors: | Mitri, Elise A ;Waldron, Jamie;Cox, Fionnuala;Chua, Kyra;Hall, Rebecca;McInnes, Kerryn;Reynolds, Gemma;Holmes, Natasha E;Trubiano, Jason A | Affiliation: | Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health Department of Pharmacy, Austin Health Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne National Allergy Centre of Excellence (NACE), hosted by the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, VIC Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA |
Issue Date: | Jul-2024 | Abstract: | Aim Sulfonamide antibiotic allergy affects 2% of the population and impacts antimicrobial prescribing. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is commonly prescribed in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs and is the preferred drug for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in immunocompromised hosts. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated the safety and antimicrobial prescribing impacts of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole direct oral challenge (DOC) for low-risk sulfonamide allergy in hospitalised patients. Methods Using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool and validated clinical decision rule, adult inpatients with a sulfonamide, ‘sulfa’ or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole allergy were evaluated during a pharmacist-led AMS allergy ward round at Austin Health. Patients with a low-risk phenotype, or SULF-FAST score < 3, were offered a single-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole DOC. Sulfonamide antibiotic prescribing and relabelling rates were evaluated three months post-DOC. Results Between 23rd March 2022 and 24th April 2024, 57 inpatients with a low-risk sulfonamide, ‘sulfa’ or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole allergy underwent DOC. Twenty-four (42%) patients had a history of immunocompromise. The most common phenotypes were: non-severe cutaneous reactions > 10 years ago (75%), unknown reactions > 5 years ago (14%), and non-immune mediated reactions that requested delabelling via DOC (11%). Fifty-seven (100%) patients had a negative DOC and were delabelled. Fourteen (25%) patients were prescribed trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole within three months of DOC, of which nine (64%) were prescribed directed therapy based on microbiological culture result, and five (36%) were prescribed PJP prophylaxis in the setting of immunosuppression. No patients had the allergy label reinstated in the medical record three months post-DOC. Conclusion Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole DOC in hospitalised patients with a low-risk sulfonamide allergy is safe and improves antimicrobial prescribing in patients requiring trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole directed or prophylactic therapy. Impact In hospitalised patients with low-risk sulfonamide allergy, oral challenge is a low-resource testing strategy, removes the requirement for outpatient skin testing, and improves antibiotic choice, importantly in immunocompromised patients. | Description: | ResearchFest 2024 | Conference Name: | ResearchFest 2024 | Conference Location: | Austin Health | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35380 | ORCID: | Type: | Conference Presentation |
Appears in Collections: | ResearchFest abstracts |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Oral Challenge for Low-Risk Sulfonamide Allergy_Elise Mitri.pdf | 2.08 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
44
checked on Dec 21, 2024
Download(s)
8
checked on Dec 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.