Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35337
Title: Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot safety and feasibility randomised controlled trial.
Austin Authors: Rose, Morgan T ;Holmes, Natasha E ;Eastwood, Glenn M ;Vogrin, Sara;James, Fiona L ;De Luca, Joseph F;Bellomo, Rinaldo ;Warrillow, Stephen J ;Phung, Michelle;Barnes, Sara L;Murfin, Brendan;Rogers, Ben;Lambros, Belinda;Collis, Brennan;Peel, Trisha N;Slavin, Monica A;Trubiano, Jason 
Affiliation: Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research
Infectious Diseases
Intensive Care
Department of Medicine (St Vincent's Hospital), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Pharmacy Department, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.;Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
Monash Lung Sleep Allergy and Immunology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Intensive Care Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.;School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.;Immunocompromised Host Infection Service, Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Level 7, Harold Stokes Building, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.;National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Issue Date: Jun-2024
Date: 2024
Publication information: Intensive Care Medicine 2024-06; 50(6)
Abstract: Critically ill patients are vulnerable to penicillin allergy labels that may be incorrect. The validity of skin testing in intensive care units (ICUs) is uncertain. Many penicillin allergy labels are low risk, and validated tools exist to identify those amenable to direct oral challenge. This pilot randomised controlled trial explored the feasibility, safety, and validity of direct enteral challenge for low-risk penicillin allergy labels in critical illness. Consenting patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy label (PAL) (PEN-FAST risk assessment score < 3) in four ICUs (Melbourne, Australia) were randomised 1:1 to penicillin (250 mg amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) direct enteral challenge versus routine care (2-h post-randomisation observation for each arm). Repeat challenge was performed post -ICU in the intervention arm. Patients were reviewed at 24 h and 5 days after each challenge/observation. We screened 533 patients. 130 (24.4%) were eligible and 80/130 (61.5%) enrolled (age median 64.5 years (interquartile range, IQR 53.5, 74), PEN-FAST median 1 (IQR 0,1)), with 40 (50%) randomised to direct enteral challenge. A positive challenge rate of 2.5% was identified. No antibiotic-associated serious adverse events were identified. 32/40 (80%) received a repeat challenge (zero positive). Post-randomisation, 13 (32%) of the intervention arm and 4 (10%) of the control arm received penicillin (odds ratio, OR 4.33 [1.27, 14.78] p = 0.019). These findings support the safety, validity, and feasibility of direct enteral challenge for critically ill patients with PEN-FAST assessed low-risk penicillin allergy. The absence of false negative results was confirmed by subsequent negative repeat challenges. A relatively low recruitment to screened ratio suggests that more inclusive eligibility criteria and integration of allergy assessment into routine ICU processes are needed to optimise allergy delabelling in critical illness.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35337
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07448-x
ORCID: 0000-0001-8714-5998
Journal: Intensive Care Medicine
Start page: 913
End page: 921
PubMed URL: 38739277
ISSN: 1432-1238
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Allergy and immunology
Antibiotics
Critical care
Direct oral challenge
Drug hypersensitivity
Oral provocation
Penicillins
Penicillins/adverse effects
Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis
Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
Risk Assessment/methods
Skin Tests/methods
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Aug 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.