Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35337
Title: | Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot safety and feasibility randomised controlled trial. | Austin Authors: | Rose, Morgan T ;Holmes, Natasha E ;Eastwood, Glenn M ;Vogrin, Sara;James, Fiona L ;De Luca, Joseph F;Bellomo, Rinaldo ;Warrillow, Stephen J ;Phung, Michelle;Barnes, Sara L;Murfin, Brendan;Rogers, Ben;Lambros, Belinda;Collis, Brennan;Peel, Trisha N;Slavin, Monica A;Trubiano, Jason | Affiliation: | Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Department of Medicine (St Vincent's Hospital), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Pharmacy Department, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.;Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia. Monash Lung Sleep Allergy and Immunology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia. Intensive Care Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia. Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.;School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.;Immunocompromised Host Infection Service, Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Health, Level 7, Harold Stokes Building, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.;National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. |
Issue Date: | Jun-2024 | Date: | 2024 | Publication information: | Intensive Care Medicine 2024-06; 50(6) | Abstract: | Critically ill patients are vulnerable to penicillin allergy labels that may be incorrect. The validity of skin testing in intensive care units (ICUs) is uncertain. Many penicillin allergy labels are low risk, and validated tools exist to identify those amenable to direct oral challenge. This pilot randomised controlled trial explored the feasibility, safety, and validity of direct enteral challenge for low-risk penicillin allergy labels in critical illness. Consenting patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy label (PAL) (PEN-FAST risk assessment score < 3) in four ICUs (Melbourne, Australia) were randomised 1:1 to penicillin (250 mg amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) direct enteral challenge versus routine care (2-h post-randomisation observation for each arm). Repeat challenge was performed post -ICU in the intervention arm. Patients were reviewed at 24 h and 5 days after each challenge/observation. We screened 533 patients. 130 (24.4%) were eligible and 80/130 (61.5%) enrolled (age median 64.5 years (interquartile range, IQR 53.5, 74), PEN-FAST median 1 (IQR 0,1)), with 40 (50%) randomised to direct enteral challenge. A positive challenge rate of 2.5% was identified. No antibiotic-associated serious adverse events were identified. 32/40 (80%) received a repeat challenge (zero positive). Post-randomisation, 13 (32%) of the intervention arm and 4 (10%) of the control arm received penicillin (odds ratio, OR 4.33 [1.27, 14.78] p = 0.019). These findings support the safety, validity, and feasibility of direct enteral challenge for critically ill patients with PEN-FAST assessed low-risk penicillin allergy. The absence of false negative results was confirmed by subsequent negative repeat challenges. A relatively low recruitment to screened ratio suggests that more inclusive eligibility criteria and integration of allergy assessment into routine ICU processes are needed to optimise allergy delabelling in critical illness. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35337 | DOI: | 10.1007/s00134-024-07448-x | ORCID: | 0000-0001-8714-5998 |
Journal: | Intensive Care Medicine | Start page: | 913 | End page: | 921 | PubMed URL: | 38739277 | ISSN: | 1432-1238 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Allergy and immunology Antibiotics Critical care Direct oral challenge Drug hypersensitivity Oral provocation Penicillins Penicillins/adverse effects Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use Risk Assessment/methods Skin Tests/methods |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.