Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34421
Title: Effects of upper limb exercise or training on hand dexterity and function in people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Austin Authors: Proud, Elizabeth;Miller, Kimberly J;Morris, Meg E;McGinley, Jennifer L;Blennerhassett, Jannette M 
Affiliation: Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3010.
Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3010; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Academic and Research Collaborative in Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia, and Victorian Rehabilitation Centre, Healthscope, Glen Waverley, 3150 Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3010.
Physiotherapy
Issue Date: 30-Nov-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023-11-30
Abstract: This systematic review investigated the effects of exercise and training on hand dexterity and function outcomes in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). We searched five databases (MEDLINE Ovid, CINAHL, PEDro, PubMed, Cochrane Database) from inception to October 2022. Included studies were randomized controlled trials delivering upper limb exercise or training interventions to people with PD and evaluating one or more upper limb activity outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened 668 articles for inclusion. Two reviewers independently extracted data relating to study participants, intervention characteristics and key outcomes. Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE tools assessed methodological quality of included studies, and strength of evidence for three outcomes: hand dexterity, self-reported hand function and handwriting performance. Meta-analyses synthesized results for within-hand dexterity and self-reported function. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (n = 704) with low to unclear risk of bias were identified. Experimental interventions varied considerably in their approach and treatment dose, and three studies focused on training handwriting. Meta-analysis showed moderate quality evidence of a small positive effect on within-hand dexterity (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI 0.07, 0.44). Very low-quality evidence pointed towards a nonsignificant effect on self-reported hand function (SMD = 0.67; 95% CI -0.40, 1.75). A narrative review of handwriting interventions showed low quality evidence for improved performance following training. There is moderate certainty of evidence supporting the use of exercise and training to address dexterity problems, but evidence remains unclear for self-reported hand function and handwriting. Our findings suggest that training could employ task-related approaches. Future research should interrogate aspects of clinical practice such as optimal dose and key ingredients for effective interventions.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34421
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.11.009
ORCID: 
Journal: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
PubMed URL: 38042246
ISSN: 1532-821X
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Hand
Occupational therapy
Parkinson disease
Physical therapy modalities
Upper extremity
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.