Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34421
Title: | Effects of upper limb exercise or training on hand dexterity and function in people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | Austin Authors: | Proud, Elizabeth;Miller, Kimberly J;Morris, Meg E;McGinley, Jennifer L;Blennerhassett, Jannette M | Affiliation: | Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3010. Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3010; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada. Academic and Research Collaborative in Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia, and Victorian Rehabilitation Centre, Healthscope, Glen Waverley, 3150 Australia. Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3010. Physiotherapy |
Issue Date: | 30-Nov-2023 | Date: | 2023 | Publication information: | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023-11-30 | Abstract: | This systematic review investigated the effects of exercise and training on hand dexterity and function outcomes in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). We searched five databases (MEDLINE Ovid, CINAHL, PEDro, PubMed, Cochrane Database) from inception to October 2022. Included studies were randomized controlled trials delivering upper limb exercise or training interventions to people with PD and evaluating one or more upper limb activity outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened 668 articles for inclusion. Two reviewers independently extracted data relating to study participants, intervention characteristics and key outcomes. Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE tools assessed methodological quality of included studies, and strength of evidence for three outcomes: hand dexterity, self-reported hand function and handwriting performance. Meta-analyses synthesized results for within-hand dexterity and self-reported function. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (n = 704) with low to unclear risk of bias were identified. Experimental interventions varied considerably in their approach and treatment dose, and three studies focused on training handwriting. Meta-analysis showed moderate quality evidence of a small positive effect on within-hand dexterity (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI 0.07, 0.44). Very low-quality evidence pointed towards a nonsignificant effect on self-reported hand function (SMD = 0.67; 95% CI -0.40, 1.75). A narrative review of handwriting interventions showed low quality evidence for improved performance following training. There is moderate certainty of evidence supporting the use of exercise and training to address dexterity problems, but evidence remains unclear for self-reported hand function and handwriting. Our findings suggest that training could employ task-related approaches. Future research should interrogate aspects of clinical practice such as optimal dose and key ingredients for effective interventions. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34421 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.11.009 | ORCID: | Journal: | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | PubMed URL: | 38042246 | ISSN: | 1532-821X | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Hand Occupational therapy Parkinson disease Physical therapy modalities Upper extremity |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.