Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34342
Title: Determinants of practice for providing decision coaching to facilitate informed values-based decision-making: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.
Austin Authors: Berger-Höger, Birte;Lewis, Krystina B;Cherry, Katherine;Finderup, Jeanette;Gunderson, Janet;Kaden, Jana;Kienlin, Simone;Rahn, Anne C;Sikora, Lindsey;Stacey, Dawn;Steckelberg, Anke;Zhao, Junqiang
Affiliation: Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.;Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nephrology
Department of Renal Medicine and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.;Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University & Central Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
Patient partner with the Saskatchewan Centre for Patient-Oriented Research and the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research's (SPOR) Chronic Pain Network, Cochrane, and the Evidence Alliance. Committee member for the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Saskatchewan, Western Canada, Canada.
Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Langnes, Norway.;Department of Medicine and Healthcare, South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Hamar, Norway.
Nursing Research Unit, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Health Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.;Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Issue Date: 15-Nov-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: BMJ Open 2023-11-15; 13(11)
Abstract: Decision coaching is a non-directive approach to support patients to prepare for making health decisions. It is used to facilitate patients' involvement in informed values-based decision-making and use of evidence-based health information. A recent systematic review revealed low certainty evidence for its effectiveness with and without evidence-based information. However, there may be opportunities to improve the study and use of decision coaching in clinical practice by systematically investigating its determinants of practice. We aim to conduct a systematic review to identify and synthesise the determinants of practice for providing decision coaching to facilitate patient involvement in decision-making from multiple perspectives that influence its use. We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review guided by the Cochrane' Handbook of Systematic Reviews. We will include studies reporting determinants of practice influencing decision coaching with or without evidence-based patient information with adults making a health decision for themselves or a family member. Systematic literature searches will be conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and PsycINFO via Ovid and CINAHL via EBSCO including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods study designs. Additionally, experts in the field will be contacted.Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data. We will synthesise determinants using deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis and a coding frame developed specifically for this review based on a taxonomy of barriers and enablers of shared decision-making mapped onto the major domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We will assess the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Ethical approval is not required as this systematic review involves only previously published literature. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at scientific conferences and disseminated to relevant consumer groups. CRD42022338299.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34342
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071478
ORCID: 0000-0002-4704-4401
0000-0001-6761-7548
0009-0000-0738-7744
0000-0003-2646-0227
0000-0002-0938-1343
0000-0001-7367-2009
0000-0002-9051-3621
0000-0002-9715-8634
0000-0002-2681-741X
0000-0002-8687-3149
0000-0002-3295-5106
Journal: BMJ Open
Start page: e071478
PubMed URL: 37968011
ISSN: 2044-6055
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Decision Making
Patient Participation
Systematic Review
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Feb 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.