Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34290
Title: Is communication key in stroke rehabilitation and recovery? National linked stroke data study.
Austin Authors: Zingelman, Sally;Wallace, Sarah J;Kim, Joosup;Mosalski, Simon;Faux, Steven G;Cadilhac, Dominique A;Alexander, Tara;Lannin, Natasha A;Olaiya, Muideen T;Clifton, Ross;Shiner, Christine T;Starr, Susan;Kilkenny, Monique F
Affiliation: Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.;Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, St Lucia, Australia.;Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.;Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, St Lucia, Australia.;Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.;Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Department of Rehabilitation, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.;Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.;Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.;Occupational Therapy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Department of Rehabilitation, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Speech Pathology, Braeside Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
School of Medicine, Sydney Campus, The University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, New South Wales, Australia.
Issue Date: 15-Nov-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2023-11-15
Abstract: Information on the characteristics or long-term outcomes of people with communication support needs post-stroke is limited. We investigated associations between communication gains in rehabilitation and long-term outcomes (quality-of-life [EuroQOL-ED-3 L], mortality) by post-stroke communication support need status. Retrospective cohort study using person-level linked data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry and the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (2014-2017). Communication support needs were assessed using the Functional Independence Measure™ comprehension and expression items recorded on admission indicated by scores one (total assistance) to five (standby prompting). Multivariable multilevel and Cox regression models were used to determine associations with long-term outcomes. Of 8,394 patients who received in-patient rehabilitation after stroke (42% female, median age 75.6 years), two-thirds had post-stroke communication support needs. Having aphasia (odds ratio [OR] 4.34, 95% CI 3.67-5.14), being aged ≥65 years (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.36), greater stroke severity (unable to walk on admission; OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.32-1.68) and previous stroke (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.41) were associated with increased likelihoods of having communication support needs. One-point improvement in FIM™ expression was associated with reduced likelihood of self-reporting problems related to mobility (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.90), self-care (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86) or usual activities (OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.94) at 90-180 days. Patients with communication support needs had greater mortality rates within one-year post-stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI: 1.65-2.39). Two-thirds of patients with stroke require communication support to participate in healthcare activities. Establishing communication-accessible stroke care environments is a priority.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34290
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2279804
ORCID: 0000-0003-0599-5708
0000-0002-0600-9343
0000-0002-4079-0428
0000-0002-0811-3814
0000-0001-8846-216X
0000-0001-8162-682X
0000-0001-5234-7821
0000-0002-2066-8345
0000-0002-4070-0533
0000-0002-6202-7976
0000-0001-9891-3307
0000-0002-3375-287X
Journal: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Start page: 1
End page: 11
PubMed URL: 37965905
ISSN: 1945-5119
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Rehabilitation
communication disorders
data linkage
mortality
quality of life
registry
stroke
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.