Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33607
Title: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Metastases-Findings from an Australian Population-Based Study.
Austin Authors: Ong, Wee Loon ;Milne, Roger L;Foroudi, Farshad ;Millar, Jeremy L
Affiliation: Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne 3004, Australia.;Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.;School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.
Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre
Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3053, Australia.;Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia.
Radiation Oncology
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Issue Date: 21-Aug-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) 2023-08-21; 30(8)
Abstract: Background: To evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases and the associated factors in Australia. Methods: The Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Dataset, which captures all episodes of radiotherapy delivered in the state of Victoria, was accessed to evaluate the patterns and trends of SBRT for spine metastases. The primary outcome was SBRT use and associated factors. Results: There were 6244 patients who received 8861 courses of radiotherapy for spine metastases between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 277 (3%) courses were SBRT, which increased from 0.4% in 2012 to 5% in 2017 (P-trend < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in patients with prostate cancer (6%) and melanoma (4%) compared to other cancers (2-3%) (p < 0.001). Patients from the highest socioeconomic quintiles (5%) were more likely to be treated with SBRT compared to patients from the lowest socioeconomic quintiles (3%) (p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in private radiotherapy centres (6%) compared to public radiotherapy centres (1%) (p < 0.001). No spine SBRT was delivered in regional centres. In multivariate analyses, the year of treatment, age, primary cancers and radiotherapy centres were independently associated with SBRT use. Conclusion: This is the first Australian population-based study quantifying the increasing use of spine SBRT; however, the overall use of spine SBRT remains low. We anticipate an ongoing increase in spine SBRT, as spine SBRT gradually becomes the standard-of-care treatment for painful spine metastases.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33607
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080564
ORCID: 0000-0001-8202-8602
Journal: Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
Start page: 7777
End page: 7788
PubMed URL: 37623045
ISSN: 1718-7729
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: health disparities
health services
spine metastases
stereotactic radiotherapy
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.