Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33564
Title: Accuracy of deep neural learning models in the imaging prediction of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review.
Austin Authors: Prabhakaran, Sowmya;Choong, Keith Wai Keong;Prabhakaran, Swetha;Choy, Kay T ;Kong, Joseph Ch
Affiliation: Department of General Surgical Specialties, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Surgery
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Issue Date: 18-Aug-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2023-08-18; 408(1)
Abstract: Up to 15-27% of patients achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Deep neural learning (DL) algorithms have been suggested to be a useful adjunct to allow accurate prediction of pCR and to identify patients who could potentially avoid surgery. This systematic review aims to interrogate the accuracy of DL algorithms at predicting pCR. Embase (PubMed, MEDLINE) databases and Google Scholar were searched to identify eligible English-language studies, with the search concluding in July 2022. Studies reporting on the accuracy of DL models in predicting pCR were selected for review and information pertaining to study characteristics and diagnostic measures was extracted from relevant studies. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Our search yielded 85 potential publications. Nineteen full texts were reviewed, and a total of 12 articles were included in this systematic review. There were six retrospective and six prospective cohort studies. The most common DL algorithm used was the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Performance comparison was carried out via single modality comparison. The median performance for each best-performing algorithm was an AUC of 0.845 (range 0.71-0.99) and Accuracy of 0.85 (0.83-0.98). There is a promising role for DL models in the prediction of pCR following neoadjuvant-CRT for LARC. Further studies are needed to provide a standardised comparison in order to allow for large-scale clinical application. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021269904 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021269904 .
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33564
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03039-4
ORCID: 0000-0003-2977-2226
0000-0002-7743-2261
0000-0002-3010-5247
0000-0001-5763-5742
0000-0002-1392-2480
Journal: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Start page: 321
PubMed URL: 37594552
ISSN: 1435-2451
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Artificial intelligence
Deep neural learning
Long course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Rectal cancer
Therapeutic response
Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
Rectal Neoplasms/therapy
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Dec 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.