Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33449
Title: Managing Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk Associated with JAK Inhibitors.
Austin Authors: Yang, Victor;Kragstrup, Tue W;McMaster, Christopher ;Reid, Pankti;Singh, Namrata;Haysen, Stine R;Robinson, Philip C;Liew, David F L 
Affiliation: Rheumatology
Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.;Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.;Sector for Rheumatology, Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Division of Rheumatology and Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, IL, USA.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.;Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Issue Date: Nov-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Drug Safety 2023-11; 46(11)
Abstract: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have enormous appeal as immune-modulating therapies across many chronic inflammatory diseases, but recently this promise has been overshadowed by questions regarding associated cardiovascular and cancer risk emerging from the ORAL Surveillance phase 3b/4 post-marketing requirement randomized controlled trial. In that study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with existing cardiovascular risk, tofacitinib, the first JAKi registered for chronic inflammatory disease, failed to meet non-inferiority thresholds when compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for both incident major adverse cardiovascular events and incident cancer. While this result was unexpected by many, subsequently published observational data have also supported this finding. Notably, however, such a risk has largely not yet been demonstrated in patients outside the specific clinical situation examined in the trial, even in the face of many studies examining this. Nevertheless, this signal has practically re-aligned approaches to both tofacitinib and other JAKi to varying extents, in other patient populations and contexts: within rheumatoid arthritis, but also in psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, atopic dermatitis, and beyond. Application to individual patients can be more challenging but remains important to harness the substantive potential of JAKi to the maximum extent safely possible. This review not only explores the evolution of the regulatory response to the signal, its informing data, biological plausibility, and its impact on guidelines, but also the many factors that clinicians must consider in navigating cardiovascular and cancer risk for their patients considering JAKi as immune-modulating therapy.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33449
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01333-0
ORCID: 0000-0003-0013-9865
0000-0002-6439-397X
0000-0003-2432-5451
0000-0002-7645-0919
0000-0001-7149-363X
0009-0006-7489-5339
0000-0002-3156-3418
0000-0001-8451-8883
Journal: Drug Safety
PubMed URL: 37490213
ISSN: 1179-1942
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s40264-023-01333-0 (4).pdf955.74 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Download(s)

42
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.