Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33246
Title: Pre-existing hiatal mesh increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery: A retrospective multicenter study.
Austin Authors: Liu, David S ;Allan, Zexi;Wong, Darren J;Goh, Su Kah ;Stevens, Sean ;Aly, Ahmad ;Bright, Tim;Watson, David I
Affiliation: General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Procedural Medicine
Surgery (University of Melbourne)
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Oesophagogastric Surgery Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.
Issue Date: 25-Jun-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Surgery 2023-06-25
Abstract: Revisional antireflux surgery, including hiatus hernia repair, is increasingly common. Mesh-augmented hiatal closure at the time of index operation is controversial but commonly performed. Although a meta-analysis of randomized data has demonstrated no additional benefit of routine mesh placement, it is unclear whether this practice results in harm, particularly at the time of revisional antireflux surgery. We determined whether pre-existing mesh at the hiatus increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery. Analysis of prospectively-maintained databases of all elective revisional antireflux surgery cases in 36 hospitals across Australia took place over 10 years. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of patients with and without prior hiatal mesh were compared. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to validate primary findings. A total of 346 revisional cases (35 with pre-existing mesh) were analyzed. The 2 groups had comparable baseline characteristics. In total, 77 (22.2%) patients had 148 intraoperative adverse events. Pre-existing mesh was associated with a higher risk of intraoperative complications (48.6% vs 22.5%, odds ratio 3.25, 95% confidence interval 1.63-6.38, P = .002), secondary to bleeding, and lacerations to pleura, lung, and liver. Overall, 63 (18.2%) patients developed postoperative complications. Pre-existing mesh was associated with increased postoperative morbidity (37.1% vs 16.1%, odds ratio 3.09, 95% confidence interval 1.50-6.43, P = .005), particularly due to bleeding and respiratory complications. Importantly, pre-existing mesh independently predicted the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Prior hiatal mesh significantly increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery. Given that revisional surgery is increasingly being performed, our findings discourage routine mesh use during primary antireflux surgery.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33246
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.029
ORCID: 
Journal: Surgery
PubMed URL: 37369605
ISSN: 1532-7361
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.