Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33182
Title: | Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome-a randomized clinical trial. | Austin Authors: | de Haro, Candelaria;Serpa Neto, Ary ;Gomà, Gemma;González, Maria Elena;Ortega, Alfonso;Forteza, Catalina;Frutos-Vivar, Fernando;García, Raquel;Simonis, Fabienne D;Gordo-Vidal, Federico;Suarez, David;Schultz, Marcus J;Artigas, Antonio | Affiliation: | Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.;CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location 'AMC', Amsterdam, Netherlands. Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain. Reanimation Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital del Henares, Grupo de Investigación en Patología Crítica de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain. Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain. Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location 'AMC', Amsterdam, Netherlands.;Department of Medical Affairs, Hamilton Medical AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland.;Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.;Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.;CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Data Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre |
Issue Date: | 2023 | Date: | 2023 | Publication information: | Frontiers in Medicine 2023; 10 | Abstract: | There is no consensus on whether invasive ventilation should use low tidal volumes (VT) to prevent lung complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study is to determine if a low VT strategy is more effective than an intermediate VT strategy in preventing pulmonary complications. A randomized clinical trial was conducted in invasively ventilated patients with a lung injury prediction score (LIPS) of >4 performed in the intensive care units of 10 hospitals in Spain and one in the United States of America (USA) from 3 November 2014 to 30 August 2016. Patients were randomized to invasive ventilation using low VT (≤ 6 mL/kg predicted body weight, PBW) (N = 50) or intermediate VT (> 8 mL/kg PBW) (N = 48). The primary endpoint was the development of ARDS during the first 7 days after the initiation of invasive ventilation. Secondary endpoints included the development of pneumonia and severe atelectases; the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay; and ICU, hospital, 28- and 90-day mortality. In total, 98 patients [67.3% male], with a median age of 65.5 years [interquartile range 55-73], were enrolled until the study was prematurely stopped because of slow recruitment and loss of equipoise caused by recent study reports. On day 7, five (11.9%) patients in the low VT group and four (9.1%) patients in the intermediate VT group had developed ARDS (risk ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.62-2.17]; p = 0.735). The incidence of pneumonia and severe atelectasis was also not different between the two groups. The use of a low VT strategy did neither affect the length of ICU and hospital stay nor mortality rates. In patients at risk for ARDS, a low VT strategy did not result in a lower incidence of ARDS than an intermediate VT strategy.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02070666. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33182 | DOI: | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1172434 | ORCID: | Journal: | Frontiers in Medicine | Start page: | 1172434 | PubMed URL: | 37351068 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | ARDS critical care intensive care lung protection mechanical ventilation mortality tidal volume |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.