Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32372
Title: | Interdisciplinary interactions, social systems and technical infrastructure required for successful implementation of mobile stroke units: A qualitative process evaluation. | Austin Authors: | Bagot, Kathleen L;Purvis, Tara;Hancock, Shaun;Zhao, Henry;Coote, Skye;Easton, Damien;Campbell, Bruce C V;Davis, Steve M;Donnan, Geoff A;Foster, Shane;Langenberg, Francesca;Smith, Karen;Stephenson, Michael;Bernard, Stephen;McGowan, Sharon;Yan, Bernard;Mitchell, Peter;Middleton, Sandy;Cadilhac, Dominique A | Affiliation: | The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. Public Health and Health Services Research, Stroke, Heidelberg, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Department of Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Department of Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. |
Issue Date: | Apr-2023 | Date: | 2023 | Publication information: | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2023; 29(3) | Abstract: | Mobile stroke units (MSUs) are increasingly being implemented to provide acute stroke care in the prehospital environment, but a comprehensive implementation evaluation has not been undertaken. To identify successes and challenges in the pre- and initial operations of the first Australian MSU service from an interdisciplinary perspective. Process evaluation of the Melbourne MSU with a mixed-methods design. Purposive sampling targeted key stakeholder groups. Online surveys (administered June-September 2019) and semistructured interviews (October-November 2019) explored experiences. Directed content analysis (raters' agreement 85%) and thematic analysis results are presented using the Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis framework. Participants representing executive/program operations, MSU clinicians and hospital-based clinicians completed 135 surveys and 38 interviews. Results converged, with major themes addressing successes and challenges: stakeholders, vehicle, knowledge, training/education, communication, work processes and working relationships. Successes and challenges of establishing a new MSU service extend beyond technical, to include operational and social aspects across prehospital and hospital environments. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32372 | DOI: | 10.1111/jep.13803 | ORCID: | 0000-0003-2895-4327 0000-0003-3332-5357 0000-0002-2015-2752 0000-0002-4320-4287 0000-0002-1773-5332 0000-0002-7201-4394 0000-0001-8162-682X |
Journal: | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | Start page: | 495 | End page: | 512 | PubMed URL: | 36648226 | ISSN: | 1365-2753 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | ambulances health services research hospitals implementation science mixed methods research mobile stroke unit process evaluation qualitative research stroke |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.