Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30933
Title: Patient attitudes towards changes in colorectal cancer surveillance: An application of the Health Belief Model.
Austin Authors: Dix, Maddison;Wilson, Carlene J ;Flight, Ingrid H;Wassie, Molla M;Young, Graeme P;Cock, Charles;Cohen-Woods, Sarah;Symonds, Erin L
Affiliation: Bowel Health Service, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia,Australia
Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia,Australia
Cancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia,Australia
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,Australia
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia,Australia
College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia,Australia
Orama Institute for Mental Health and Well-Being, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia,Australia
Issue Date: 24-Sep-2022
Date: 2022
Publication information: European Journal of Cancer Care 2022; 31(6)
Abstract: This is to determine whether health beliefs regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening could predict discomfort with a change to CRC surveillance proposing regular faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) instead of colonoscopy. Eight hundred individuals enrolled in a South Australian colonoscopy surveillance programme were invited to complete a survey on surveillance preferences. Responses were analysed using binary logistic regression predicting discomfort with a hypothetical FIT-based surveillance change. Predictor variables included constructs based on the Health Belief Model: perceived threat of CRC, perceived confidence to complete FIT and colonoscopy (self-efficacy), perceived benefits from current surveillance and perceived barriers to FIT and colonoscopy. A total of 408 participants (51%) returned the survey (complete data n = 303; mean age 62 years, 52% male). Most participants (72%) were uncomfortable with FIT-based surveillance reducing colonoscopy frequency. This attitude was predicted by a higher perceived threat of CRC (OR = 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.04]), higher colonoscopy self-efficacy (OR = 1.34 [95% CI 1.13-1.59]) and lower perceived barriers to colonoscopy (OR = 0.92 [95% CI 0.86-0.99]). Health beliefs regarding colonoscopy and perceived threat of CRC may be important to consider when changing CRC surveillance protocols. If guideline changes were introduced, these factors should be addressed to provide patients reassurance concerning the efficacy of the alternative protocol.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30933
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13713
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9934-8079
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-4690
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-0869
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-2397
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-8383
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-1137
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2199-6129
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-0358
Journal: European Journal of Cancer Care
PubMed URL: 36151912
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: colonoscopy
colorectal neoplasms
early detection of cancer
faecal occult blood test
patient preference
population surveillance
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

56
checked on Jan 4, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.