Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30479
Title: Prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings reduces wound complications following emergency laparotomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Austin Authors: Lakhani, Amar;Jamel, Wael;Riddiough, Georgina E ;Cabalag, Carlos S;Stevens, Sean ;Liu, David Shi Hao 
Affiliation: Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research Group, the University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Procedural Medicine
Surgery (University of Melbourne)
Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Surgery
Issue Date: 30-Jun-2022
Date: 2022
Publication information: Surgery 2022; 172(3): 949-954
Abstract: Wound complications are a common cause of postoperative morbidity and incur significant healthcare costs. Recent studies have shown that negative pressure wound dressings reduce wound complication rates, particularly surgical site infections, after elective laparotomies. The clinical utility of prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings for closed emergency laparotomy incisions remains controversial. This meta-analysis investigated the rates of wound complications after emergency laparotomy when a negative pressure wound dressing was applied. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, and Clinialtrials.gov databases were searched from January 1, 2005, to April 1, 2022. All studies comparing negative pressure wound dressings to standard dressings on closed emergency laparotomy incisions were included. A total of 1,199 (negative pressure wound dressings: 566, standard dressing: 633) patients from 7 (prospective: 4, retrospective: 3) studies were identified. Overall, the surgical site infection (superficial/deep) rate was 13.6% (77/566) vs 25.1% (159/633) in the negative pressure wound dressing versus standard dressing groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.62). Wound breakdown (skin/fascial dehiscence) was significantly lower in the negative pressure wound dressing (7.7%) group compared to the standard dressing (16.9%) group (odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.72). The incidence of overall wound complications was significantly lower in the negative pressure wound dressing (15.9%) group compared to the standard dressing (30.4%) group (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.59). No significant differences were found in hospital length-of-stay and readmission rates. Prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings for closed emergency laparotomy incisions were associated with a significant reduction in surgical site infections, wound breakdown, and overall wound complications, thus supporting its clinical use.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30479
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.020
Journal: Surgery
PubMed URL: 35779950
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

80
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.