Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30334
Title: Cost-effectiveness of the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine program.
Austin Authors: Kim, Joosup;Tan, Elise;Gao, Lan;Moodie, Marj;Dewey, Helen M;Bagot, Kathleen L;Pompeani, Nancy;Sheppard, Lauren;Bladin, Christopher F;Cadilhac, Dominique A
Affiliation: Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Vic., Australia..
Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Vic., Australia..
Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic., Australia..
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia..
Issue Date: Jun-2022
Publication information: Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association 2022; 46(3): 294-301
Abstract: Objective Stroke telemedicine improves the provision of reperfusion therapies in regional hospitals, yet evidence of its cost-effectiveness using patient-level data is lacking. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from stroke telemedicine. Methods As part of the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine (VST) program, stroke telemedicine provided to 16 hospitals in regional Victoria was evaluated using a historical-control design. Patient-level costs from a societal perspective (2018 Australian dollars (A$)) and QALYs up to 12 months after stroke were estimated using data from medical records, surveys at 3 months and 12 months after stroke and multiple imputation. Multivariable regression models and bootstrapping were used to estimate differences between periods. Results Costs and health outcomes were estimated from 1024 confirmed strokes suffered by patients arriving at hospital within 4.5 h of stroke onset (median age 76 years, 55% male, 83% ischaemic stroke; 423 from the control period). Total costs to 12 months post stroke were estimated to be A$82 449 per person for the control period and A$82 259 in the intervention period (P  = 0.986). QALYs at 12 months were estimated to be 0.43 per person for the control period and 0.5 per person in the intervention period (P  = 0.02). Following 1000 iterations of bootstrapping, in comparison to the control period, the VST intervention was more effective and cost saving in 50.6% of iterations and cost-effective (A$0 and A$50 000 per QALY gained) in 10.4% of iterations. Conclusion The VST program was likely to be cost saving or cost-effective. Our findings provide confidence in supporting wider implementation of telemedicine for acute stroke care in Australia.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30334
DOI: 10.1071/AH21377
ORCID: 0000-0002-4079-0428
0000-0003-2895-4327
0000-0003-3397-0161
0000-0002-1729-0855
0000-0001-8162-682X
Journal: Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association
PubMed URL: 35589669
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35589669/
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.