Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30299
Title: | Telehealth for rehabilitation and recovery after stroke: State of the evidence and future directions. | Austin Authors: | English, Coralie;Ceravolo, Maria Gabriella;Dorsch, Simone;Drummond, Avril;Gandhi, Dorcas Bc;Halliday Green, Judith;Schelfaut, Ben;Verschure, Paul;Urimubenshi, Gerard;Savitz, Sean | Affiliation: | School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.. Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.. The StrokeEd Collaboration, Ashfield, NSW, Australia.. Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle March, Ancona, Italy.. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.. College of Physiotherapy and Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, India.. Stroke Survivor, UK.. SPECS-lab, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.. Department of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.. Institute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.. Institució Catalana de la Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain.. |
Issue Date: | Jun-2022 | Date: | 2022 | Publication information: | International Journal of Stroke : Official Journal of the International Stroke Society 2022; 17(5): 487-493 | Abstract: | The aim of this rapid review and opinion paper is to present the state of the current evidence and present future directions for telehealth research and clinical service delivery for stroke rehabilitation. We conducted a rapid review of published trials in the field. We searched Medline using key terms related to stroke rehabilitation and telehealth or virtual care. We also searched clinical trial registers to identify key ongoing trials. The evidence for telehealth to deliver stroke rehabilitation interventions is not strong and is predominantly based on small trials prone to Type 2 error. To move the field forward, we need to progress to trials of implementation that include measures of adoption and reach, as well as effectiveness. We also need to understand which outcome measures can be reliably measured remotely, and/or develop new ones. We present tools to assist with the deployment of telehealth for rehabilitation after stroke. The current, and likely long-term, pandemic means that we cannot wait for stronger evidence before implementing telehealth. As a research and clinical community, we owe it to people living with stroke internationally to investigate the best possible telehealth solutions for providing the highest quality rehabilitation. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30299 | DOI: | 10.1177/17474930211062480 | ORCID: | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-7927 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2694-4638 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0319-2912 |
Journal: | International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society | PubMed URL: | 34983266 | PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34983266/ | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Telehealth rehabilitation virtual care |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.