Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30265
Title: Multidisciplinary Care and Prognosis in Patients With COPD and Interstitial Lung Disease Prescribed Long-Term Oxygen Therapy.
Austin Authors: Harrison, Amelia Ca;Robinson, Julien F;Tu, Laura;McDonald, Christine F ;Khor, Yet Hong
Affiliation: Institute for Breathing and Sleep
Respiratory and Sleep Medicine
Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Jun-2022
Date: 2022-05-03
Publication information: Respiratory Care 2022; 67(6): 667-675
Abstract: Home oxygen therapy is prescribed for patients with advanced lung disease based on the criteria established in landmark trials in subjects with COPD. In clinical practice, its use has been extrapolated to other diseases, including interstitial lung disease (ILD). Patients with COPD and ILD experience a high symptom burden and require access to specialized multidisciplinary care. We aimed to evaluate the health-related outcomes and supportive care needs of patients with COPD and ILD receiving home oxygen therapy. This was a retrospective cohort study using the oxygen database of a quaternary metropolitan teaching hospital. Patients with a diagnosis of COPD or ILD who were prescribed home oxygen therapy between January 2012-December 2018 were identified. Demographic information, results of physiologic testing, comorbidities, hospitalizations, and mortality data were collected. Three hundred and eighty-four subjects were included for analysis, of whom 56% were male. The median age was 75 y. The majority (59%) had a diagnosis of COPD. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) was prescribed for 187 (48.7%), with no significant demographic differences between those with COPD or ILD. Another 187 were prescribed ambulatory oxygen alone, with 55 transitioning to LTOT during the study period. Most subjects (65.4%) were referred for pulmonary rehabilitation; however, palliative care referrals were generally low (22.9%). Referrals to other medical specialties and allied health were common (82%). Transplant-free survival after commencement of LTOT was poor, with 38% of subjects surviving at 5 y. The 5-y survival of subjects with ILD after commencing on LTOT was 10% compared to 52% for those with COPD. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the only predictor of survival after commencing LTOT was the principal respiratory diagnosis. This study found that subjects prescribed LTOT had poor transplant-free survival after initiation, which was significantly worse for those with ILD compared to those with COPD. Despite their poor overall survival, worse than many cancers, only a minority were referred for palliative care input. Referrals to pulmonary rehabilitation were also suboptimal. This patient population had complex care needs requiring multidisciplinary management. Appropriate and early referrals to palliative care and improved care coordination for this complex group of patients are key areas for improvement in clinical practice.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30265
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09446
ORCID: 0000-0001-6481-3391
0000-0002-5434-9342
Journal: Respiratory Care
PubMed URL: 35504724
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35504724/
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: COPD
ambulatory oxygen therapy
interstitial lung disease
long-term oxygen therapy
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.