Austin Health

Title
Clinical Outcomes Following Rectal Artery Embolisation for the Treatment of Internal Haemorrhoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Publication Date
2022-05-12
Author(s)
Nguyenhuy, Minhtuan
Xu, Yifan
Kok, Hong Kuan
Maingard, Julian
Joglekar, Shantanu
Jhamb, Ashu
Brooks, Mark
Asadi, Hamed
Subject
Embolization
Haemorrhoids
Interventional radiology
Quality of life
Type of document
Journal Article
OrcId
0000-0002-4546-2079
0000-0001-5034-570X
0000-0003-2475-9727
DOI
10.1007/s00270-022-03154-7
Abstract
Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a common anorectal disorder which can substantially impair quality of life. Rectal artery embolisation (RAE) is a recently described technique for the management of HD, however, its clinical efficacy and safety are unclear at present. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes following RAE. The PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies specifying the management of haemorrhoids with RAE from January 2000 to October 2021. Primary outcomes were: French bleeding score (FBS), Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, general quality of life (QoL) score, and the Goligher prolapse score (GPS). Secondary outcomes were technical success, clinical success, postoperative complications, and technical outcomes. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Study heterogeneity was evaluated, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Thirteen eligible studies were identified including 381 patients. Rectal artery embolisation was associated with improvements in the FBS (mean difference [MD] 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-3.23), VAS (MD 1.92; 95% CI 1.58-2.27) and QoL (MD 1.41; 95% CI 1.20-3.80), although the grade of internal haemerrhoids increased with uncertain clinical significance (MD 0.30; 95% CI 0.23-0.36). Technical success was achieved in almost all procedures (99%; 95% CI 94-100%) however clinical efficacy was lower (82%; 95% CI 73-89%). Procedural duration and radiation exposure were heterogeneous. No major complications occurred. RAE demonstrates early clinical efficacy with low rates of peri-procedural complications or morbidity. RAE is a promising addition to the treatment options available for HD and warrants ongoing research.
Link
Citation
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2022; 45(9): 1351-1361
Jornal Title
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink