| Author(s) |
|
Satterthwaite, Theodore D |
|
|
| Abstract |
|
In the medical imaging domain, deep learning-based methods have yet to see widespread clinical adoption, in part due to limited generalization performance across different imaging devices and acquisition protocols. The deviation between estimated brain age and biological age is an established biomarker of brain health and such models may benefit from increased cross-site generalizability. To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based image harmonization method to improve cross-site generalizability of deep learning age prediction. Retrospective. Eight thousand eight hundred and seventy-six subjects from six sites. Harmonization models were trained using all subjects. Age prediction models were trained using 2739 subjects from a single site and tested using the remaining 6137 subjects from various other sites. Brain imaging with magnetization prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo or spoiled gradient echo sequences at 1.5 T and 3 T. StarGAN v2, was used to perform a canonical mapping from diverse datasets to a reference domain to reduce site-based variation while preserving semantic information. Generalization performance of deep learning age prediction was evaluated using harmonized, histogram matched, and unharmonized data. Mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson correlation between estimated age and biological age quantified the performance of the age prediction model. Our results indicated a substantial improvement in age prediction in out-of-sample data, with the overall MAE improving from 15.81 (±0.21) years to 11.86 (±0.11) with histogram matching to 7.21 (±0.22) years with generative adversarial network (GAN)-based harmonization. In the multisite case, across the 5 out-of-sample sites, MAE improved from 9.78 (±6.69) years to 7.74 (±3.03) years with histogram normalization to 5.32 (±4.07) years with GAN-based harmonization. While further research is needed, GAN-based medical image harmonization appears to be a promising tool for improving cross-site deep learning generalization. 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1. |
|
|
